En till artikel om Gardasilvaccinet (HPV)

Det är verkligen helt förfärligt med alla biverkningar med det här vaccinet – hur många flickor (och pojkar, också) ska behöva dö innan det händer något? Och om dom inte dör, så är det väldigt många som får permanenta kroppsskador. Och vaccinet hjälper ju inte mot cancer, vissa som har fått vaccinet har fått cancer – det som vaccinet var tänkt att förhindra…
Här är Majas historia


Vem ska bota Maja?
Sön 23 aug 2015 kl 15:03

2013 blev Maja sjuk. Hon var 13 och helt orkeslös. Sakta har hon blivit allt sämre: värk, känselbortfall, och plågsamma utslag. Nu sitter hon i rullstol och ingen läkare kan säga vad hon lider av.
Maja skickas vidare från den ena specialisten till den andra; de tar samma plågsamma prover och hon får berätta samma historia om och om igen. Men de kan inte bota henne och en efter en ger de upp om hennes fall.  Och hela tiden blir hon sämre.Det började med att hon kände sig lite hängig, att hon inte orkade lika mycket när hon spelade innebandy. Sedan kom värk,  känselbortfall och muskelsvaghet, benen blev som spagetti. I dag kan hon inte sitta upp själv och hon har inte kunnat gå i skolan på två år.

Maja och hennes föräldrar  upplever att de inte blir tagna på allvar av sjukvården. Själva är familjen övertygad om att hon skadats av Gardasil, ett vaccin mot livmoderhalscancer som erbjuds alla grundskoletjejer i Sverige. Det var  nämligen efter att hon fått  tre vaccinsprutor som hennes symtom dök upp.

Och ingen läkare har kunnat ge någon alternativ förklaring.

I Danmark har det uppstått en debatt om biverkningar av Gardasil efter en uppmärksammad TV-dokumentär om ett 100-tal unga tjejer som anser sig handikappade av vaccinet. Men i Sverige är det alltjämt en ickefråga och en ickediagnos.

Dokumentären är gjord av Per Shapiro, frilansreporter med inriktning på undersökande journalistik och dokumentärt berättande. Han arbetar  bland annat för Ekot, Kaliber, och Uppdrag granskning.

“Vem ska bota Maja” är hans andra P1 Dokumentär. Han har tidigare gjort “Lettland – drömmen som gick i kras”

Producent: Håkan Engström

Och här är en artikel om en pojke som dog av Gardasilvaccinet


Healthy Boy Dies After Gardasil Injection

Joel Gomez was just 14 years old. Medical records show he was a healthy boy who made all his check-ups at his pediatrician’s office.He had no pre-existing health issues.

He had no cardiac abnormalities, psychological disorders, substance abuse, or any other issues.

But, he had a vaccine the day before he died.

From the article:

“An expert hired by the family of a boy who died after his second Gardasil injection has testified that Gardasil likely caused the boy’s death. The case – Gomez versus USDOH: Petition No. 15-0160V1 – was filed by a California law firm for petitioners Adan Gomez and Raquel Ayon, on behalf of their deceased son Joel Gomez.  The petition states, in part:

“Joel Gomez received a Merck Gardasil vaccine on June 19, 2013 and again on August 19, 2013, and died in his sleep the following day on August 20, 2013. The death was caused in fact by receiving the Gardasil Vaccine.

Gardasil did cause or contributed to a myocardial infarction in the decedent, and that the second dose of Gardasil finally caused a fatal hypotension in this case on the day of vaccination. There was no other plausible cause for the death of Joel Gomez. . .”

Sadly, Joel was another casualty of the Gardasil vaccine.

Joel was injected, in his left arm, on June 19, 2013 with his first dose of Gardasil (with no adverse reactions reported by the family or physician) and again on August 19, 2013, with a second dose of Gardasil. Then he went home, fell asleep, and died. He was found unresponsive in bed the following day, taken to the hospital, and pronounced dead.

How many more kids have to suffer, or even die before the United States says “enough”?

An autopsy done on August 23, by a medical examiner (ME) of Los Angeles, California revealed significant abnormal findings:

“…a long narrow band of dark reddish discoloration which is somewhat darker than the rest of the myocardium, extends over a length of 6 cm and has a width of 0.4 cm extending from the anterior base of the heart almost to the apex. ..this lesion is limited to the anterior free wall. Both lungs are extremely heavy. The lung parenchyma is dark-purple-red and completely soaked with edema fluid and blood. Microscopically, a localized lesion was found in the left ventricle of the heart.”

When Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD (who the family hired) reviewed the autopsy findings, it was his opinion that the lesion of the heart was a healing myocardial infarct – a few weeks old- and was the result of the first Gardasil vaccination. He stated, “The HPV L1 gene DNA fragments bound to the aluminum adjuvant in Gardasil can cause sudden and unexpected surge of tumor necrosis factor-α and other cytokines. Some of these cytokines released from macrophages are potent myocardial depressants, capable of causing hypotension with low cardiac perfusions in certain genetically or physically predisposed individuals.” And this type of damage, according to Dr. Lee is practically unheard of. In fact, poor Joel’s heart actually presents as a textbook description of myocardial infarction- commonly observed in much older patients with a history of heart attack(s).

More from the article:

“A CDC study shows that among 12,424 reported adverse events following Gardasil® vaccination from June 1, 2006 through December 3 1, 2008, there were 32 deaths with a mean age of 18 years old, who died 2 to 405 days after the last Gardasil® injection. Medical records and autopsy reports on 20 of the 32 deaths were available for review and confirmed there were 4 unexplained deaths and 6 cardiac-related deaths.”

Again, how many more kids need to die? And how many Gardasil-vaccinated girls (or boys) have developed permanent myocardial damage, whether it’s called myocarditis or infarct?

Our hearts go out to all the parents and families who have had loved ones die or who have been seriously harmed by this vaccine, or any other. We look ahead with hope, to a day when this won’t happen anymore. And we can make it happen. All it takes is just one voice. Don’t be afraid to use yours.

XO- Erin


Article from Dr Tim O’Shea: Vaccines and the Peanut Allergy Epidemic

Another vaccine-related article, written by Dr Tim O’Shea – this article is about peanut allergy


– Dr Tim O’Shea

Have you ever wondered why so many kids these days are allergic to peanuts? Where did this allergy come from all of a sudden?

Before 1900, reactions to peanuts were unheard of. Today almost a 1.5 million children in this country are allergic to peanuts.

What happened? Why is everybody buying EpiPens now?

Looking at all the problems with vaccines during the past decade, [2] just a superficial awareness is enough to raise the suspicion that vaccines might have some role in the appearance of any novel allergy among children.

But reactions to peanuts are not just another allergy. Peanut allergy has suddenly emerged as the #1 cause of death from food reactions, being in a category of allergens able to cause anaphylaxis. This condition brings the risk of asthma attack, shock, respiratory failure, and even death. Primarily among children.

Sources cited in Heather Fraser’s 2011 book The Peanut Allergy Epidemic suggest a vaccine connection much more specifically. We learn that a class of vaccine adjuvants – excipients – is a likely suspect in what may accurately be termed an epidemic. [1]

But let’s back up a little. We have to look at both vaccines and antibiotics in recent history, and the physical changes the ingredients in these brand new medicines introduced into the blood of children.


Before 1900, anaphylactic shock was virtually unknown. The syndrome of sudden fainting, respiratory distress, convulsions, and sometimes death did not exist until vaccinators switched from the lancet to the hypodermic needle. That transformation was essentially complete by the turn of the century in the western world.

Right at that time, a new disease called Serum Sickness began to afflict thousands of children. A variety of symptoms, including shock, fainting, and sometimes death, could suddenly result following an injection.

Instead of covering it up, the connection was well recognized and documented in the medical literature of the day.  Dr Clemens Von Pirquet, who actually coined the word “allergy,” was a leading researcher in characterizing the new disease. [5] Serum Sickness was the first mass allergenic phenomenon in history. What had been required for its onset, apparently, was the advent of the hypodermic needle.

When the needle replaced the lancet in the late 1800s, Serum Sickness soon became a frequent visitor to the child’s bed. It was a known consequence of vaccinations. Indeed, the entire field of modern allergy has evolved from the early study of Serum Sickness coming from vaccines.


Von Pirquet recognized that vaccines had 2 primary effects: immunity and hypersensitivity. [5] He said they were inseparable: the one was the price of the other.

In other words, if we were going to benefit from the effects of mass immunization, we must accept the downside of mass hypersensitivity as a necessary co-feature. Modern medicine has decided that this double effect should be kept secret, so they don’t allow it to be brought up much.

Many doctors in the early 1900s were dead set against vaccines for this precise reason. The advertised benefit was not proven to be worth the risk. Doctors like Walter Hadwen MD, Wm. Howard Hay, and Alfred Russell Wallace saw how smallpox vaccines had actually increased the incidence of smallpox. [2,3] Wallace was one of the principal epidemiologists of the age, and his charts showing the increase in smallpox death from vaccination are unassailable – meticulous primary sources.

Another landmark researcher of the early 1900s was Dr Charles Richet, the one who coined the term anaphylaxis. [4] Richet focused on the reactions that some people seemed to have to certain foods. He found that with food allergies, the reaction came on as the result of intact proteins in the food having bypassed the digestive system and making their way intact into the blood, via leaky gut.

Foreign protein in the blood, of course, is a universal trigger for allergic reaction, not just in man but in all animals. [6]

But Richet noted that in the severe cases, food anaphylaxis did not happen just by eating a food. That would simply be food poisoning.

Food anaphylaxis is altogether different. This sudden, violent reaction requires an initial sensitization involving injection of some sort, followed by a later ingestion of the sensitized food. Get the shot, then later eat the food.

The initial exposure creates the hypersensitivity. The second exposure would be the violent, perhaps fatal, physical event.

Richet’s early work around 1900 was primarily with eggs, meat, milk and diphtheria proteins. Not peanuts. The value of Richet’s research with reactive foods was to teach us the sequence of allergic sensitivity leading to anaphylaxis, how that had to take place.

Soon other doctors began to notice striking similarities between food reactions and the serum sickness that was associated with vaccines. Same exact clinical presentation.


Next up was penicillin, which became popular in the 1940s. It was soon found that additives called excipients were necessary to prolong the effect of the antibiotic injected into the body. The excipients would act as carrier molecules. Without excipients, the penicillin would only last about 2 hours. Refined oils worked best, acting as time-release capsules for the antibiotic.

Peanut oil became the favorite, because it worked well, and was available and inexpensive.

Allergy to penicillin became common, and was immediately recognized as a sensitivity to the excipient oils. To the present day, that’s why they always ask if you’re allergic to penicillin. The allergy is a sensitivity to the excipients.

By 1953 as many as 12% of the population was allergic to penicillin. [1] But considering the upside with life-threatening bacterial infections, it was still a good deal – a worthwhile risk.

By 1950 antibiotics were being given out like M&Ms. Soldiers, children, anybody with any illness, not just bacterial. Despite Alexander Fleming’s severe warnings against prophylactic antibiotics, antibiotics were given indiscriminately as the new wonder drug. Just in case anything. [7] Only then, in the 1950s, did peanut allergy begin to occur, even though Americans had been eating peanuts for well over a century.

Remember – just eating peanuts cannot cause peanut allergy. Except if they are allowed to become moldy of course, in which case aflatoxins are released. But that’s really not a peanut allergy.

When peanut allergy did appear, the numbers of cases were fairly small and initially it wasn’t even considered worthy of study.


The big change came with vaccines. Peanut oils were introduced as vaccine excipients in the mid 1960s. An article appeared in the NY Times on 18 Sept, 1964 that would never be printed today. [8] The author described how a newly patented ingredient containing peanut oil was added as an adjuvant to a new flu vaccine, in order to prolong the “immunity.” The oil was reported to act as a time release capsule, and theoretically enhanced the vaccine’s strength. Same mechanism as with penicillin.

That new excipient, though not approved in the US, became the model for subsequent vaccines. ([1] p 103)

By 1980 peanut oil had become the preferred excipient in vaccines, even though the dangers were well documented. [9] It was considered an adjuvant – a substance able to increase reactivity to the vaccine. This reinforced the Adjuvant Myth: the illusion that immune response is the same as immunity [2].

The pretense here is that the stronger the allergic response to the vaccine, the greater will be the immunity that is conferred. This fundamental error is consistent throughout vaccine literature of the past century.

Historically, researchers who challenged this Commandment of vaccine mythology did not advance their careers.


The first study of peanut allergies was not undertaken until 1973. It was a study of peanut excipients in vaccines. Soon afterwards, and as a result of the attention from that study, manufacturers were no longer required to disclose all the ingredients in vaccines.

What is listed in the Physicians Desk Reference in each vaccine section is not the full formula. Same with the inserts. Suddenly after 1973, that detailed information was proprietary: the manufacturers knew it must be protected. Intellectual property. So now they only were required to describe the formula in general.

Why was peanut allergy so violent? Adjuvant pioneer Maurice Hilleman claimed peanut oil adjuvants had all protein removed by refining. [9] The FDA disagreed. They said some peanut protein traces would always persist [10]- that even the most refined peanut oils still contained some traces of intact peanut proteins. This was the reason doctors were directed to inject vaccines intramuscular rather than intravenous – a greater chance of absorption of intact proteins, less chance of reaction.

But all their secret research obviously wasn’t enough to prevent sensitivity. Mother Nature bats last: no intact proteins in the body. 60 million years of Natural Selection didn’t create the mammalian immune system for nothing. Put intact proteins, peanut or whatever, for any imagined reason into the human system and the inflammatory response will fire. And since the goal of oil emulsion adjuvants was to prolong reactivity in the first place – the notion of time-release – this led to sensitization.


Although peanut allergies became fairly common during the 1980s, it wasn’t until the early 1990s when there was a sudden surge of children reacting to peanuts – the true epidemic appeared. What changed? The Mandated Schedule of vaccines for children doubled from the 80s to the 90s:

1980 – 20 vaccines
1995 – 40 vaccines
2011 – 68 vaccines 

It would be imprudent enough to feed peanuts to a newborn, since the digestive system is largely unformed. But this is much worse – injecting intact proteins directly into the infant’s body. In 36 vaccines before the age of 18 months.

A new kind of anaphylaxis appeared with peanut reactions: reverse anaphylaxis. (p 172, [1]) The reaction was not only to the sensitizing antigen, but to the weird new antibodies that had just been introduced in the human species by the new antigen. Without the usual benefit of the evolutionary process.

As vaccines doubled between the 1980s and the 1990s, hundreds of thousands of kids were now exhibiting peanut sensitivities, with frequent cases of anaphylaxis reactions, sometimes fatal.

But nobody talked about it.

Following the next enormous increase in vaccines on the Mandated Schedule after 9/11, whereby the total shot up to 68 recommended vaccines, the peanut allergy soon reached epidemic proportions: a million children: 1.5% of them. These numbers fit the true definition of epidemic even though that word has never been used in mainstream literature with respect to peanut allergy, except in Fraser’s odd little book.

Many researchers, not just Heather Fraser, could see very clearly that

“The peanut allergy epidemic in children was precipitated by childhood injections.”
( [1], p 106)

But with the newfound research, the medical profession will do what they always must do – bury it. Protect the companies. So no money will be ever allocated from NIH to study the obvious connection between vaccine excipients and peanut allergy. That cannot happen, primarily because it would require a control group – an unvaccinated population. And that is the Unspoken Forbidden.

Same line of reasoning that has prevented Wakefield’s work from ever being replicated in a mainstream US clinical study. No unvaccinated populations. Which actually means no studies whose outcome could possibly implicate vaccines as a source of disease or immunosuppression. Vaccines as a cause of an allergy epidemic? Impossible. Let’s definitely not study it.

Instead let’s spend the next 20 years looking for the Genetic Link to the childhood peanut allergy epidemic…

In such a flawed system, any pretense of true clinical science is revealed as fatally handicapped of course: we are looking for the truth, wherever our studies shall take us, except for this, and this, and oh yes, this.

Evidence for the connection between peanut excipients and vaccines is largely indirect today, because of the circling of the wagons by the manufacturers. It is very difficult to find peanut excipients listed in the inserts and PDR listings of vaccines. Simple liability.


So in addition to all the other problems with vaccines delineated in our text, now we have a new one – peanut oil excipients. Which all by themselves can cause severe, even fatal, episodes of shock, as well as chronic allergy – irrespective of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol, and the attenuated pathogens which the manufacturers do admit to.

Quite a toxic burden to saddle the unprotected newborn with. No wonder the US Supreme Court refers to vaccines as “unavoidably unsafe.”

Childhood allergies doubled between 1980 and 2000, and have doubled again since that time. [11] Theories abound. Childhood vaccines doubled at the same time. Why is there a virtual blackout of viable discussion about this glaring fact?

The epidemic of peanut allergy is just one facet of this much broader social phenomenon. We have the sickest, most allergic kids of any country, industrialized or not, on Earth. A study of the standard literature of vaccines is identical to a study of the history of adjuvants – an exercise in cover-up and dissimulation. Unvaccinated children don’t become autistic. And they don’t go into shock from eating peanuts.

But there can never be a formal clinical study where the control group is unvaccinated. NIH would never do that. They cannot. They know the outcome.


1. Fraser, H, The Peanut allergy epidemic, Skyhorse 2011

2. O’Shea, T, Vaccination is not immunization, thedoctorwithin 2013

3. Wallace, AR, Vaccine delusion, 1898

4. Richet, C, Nobel lecture, acceptance speech, 11 Dec 1913
Nobel Lectures Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967

5. Von Pirquet, C, MD, On the theory of infectious disease
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 80, January 1987

6. O’Shea, T, Allergies: the threshold of reactivity

7. O’Shea, T, The post antibiotic age

8. Jones, S, Peanut oil used in a new vaccine New York Times 18 Sep 13

9. HOBSON, D, MD, The potential role of immunological adjuvants
in influenza vaccines Postgraduate Medical Journal March 1973 , no. 49, p 180.

9. Technical Report # 595, Immunological Adjuvants, World Health Org. 1976.

10. FDA: March 2006. Approaches to Establish Thresholds for Major Food Allergens

11. O’Shea, T, The threshold of reactivity

Article (Catherine Frompovich): HPV vaccine damaged girls in Colombia

More about vaccines, this time about HPV (Gardasil):


HPV Vaccine Damaged Girls In Colombia Stir International Quest For Justice

During all my years of research regarding vaccines, their chemical compositions, and inevitable adverse reactions or events, I never failed to question how come – or why – the U.S. CDC and/or FDA never “got it” with regard to all the adverse events and ill-health reports filed for the health problems apparently induced by vaccines, especially since the U.S. CDC vaccine mandates of the 1980s.

Protracted vaccine-induced health problems have magnified (see the VAERS reports) to the point where, currently, there is a tremendous backlash against vaccines, which probably is long overdue, and needs to be supported by medical professionals, who ought to know better. Undoubtedly, one would think that MDs were ‘pimping’ for Big Pharma, if one didn’t know better.

In the October 6, 2014 issue of Time, Jeffrey Kluger wrote the article “Who’s Afraid Of A Little Vaccine?”, which seems to make sense, except when a reader steps back, evaluates, and parses the obvious “set-in-stone” debate that Kluger proffers. Obviously, there is much to challenge about Kluger’s pontifications, especially when one is either a consumer health researcher with no financial interests in vaccines, as I have been; or is not willing to accept the ‘force-fed’ dogma that vaccines cannot harm, which is total medical mythology and poppycock; or is not a paid astroturfer.

To scientifically refute vaccine apologists’ ‘fairy tales’, please check out The Vaccine Research Library where you can read thousands upon thousands of valid published medical research, papers, abstracts, articles, etc. that expose the real, documented harm vaccines cause. Furthermore, I document and explain many toxic ingredients from published peer review articles in vaccines in my 2013 book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines.

Every pharmaceutical ever manufactured by Big Pharma had/has contraindications, adverse reactions, or warnings and precautions as published in every pharmaceutical product’s “package insert” (PI). One such example is the PI for Merck & Company’s HPV vaccine Gardasil®. Furthermore, every parent or legal guardian should be required by law to read/study every vaccine PI before each vaccination can be administered, as part of the educational campaign to vaccinate their children.

Reading the Gardasil PI, one easily can see that “…other seizure-like activity, has been reported following vaccination with GARDASIL.” Since seizure-like activity can encompass a litany of central nervous system (CNS) issues or problems, why do the CDC, FDA and Merck not recognize or admit that the CNS problems girls have been experiencing after Gardasil shots – a series of 3 injections several months apart – can be related, or even cause them?

As an aside, some recent research may be of help to Gardasil damage/repair researchers. Since most CNS damage usually involves myelin sheath damage, new research is showing promise that the medicinal mushroom Hericium erinaceus, aka the Lion’s Mane or Monkey’s Head, may improve transmission of nerve messages and myelin sheath growth. [See 15, 16]

In the South American country of Colombia over 700 girls have been adversely affected, which I will discuss later. But the serious concern is how come HPV vaccines have been allowed to stay on the market, damage, and kill vaccinees when no one in the CDC, FDA, U.S. Congress, who has oversight, and the supposed ‘free press’ have not been able to do something to expose these life-threatening and life-altering HPV vaccines for recall.

For the official record, the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) reports that twelve (12) deaths were attributed to HPV vaccines as filed or reported with them. [1]

Whereas, according to the SGS website regarding automotive industry recalls,

In a recall, products of a production serial or batch with harmful manufacturing defectsare retrieved from the market. Such a recall can be ordered by official testing authorities or upon a firm’s own request. [2] [CJF emphasis added]

Quite frankly, nothing is more valid proof of apparent serious harmful manufacturing ingredients, e.g., toxic chemicals and neurotoxins, regarding Gardasil, in this writer’s opinion, than the CDC’s VAERS reports statistics for HPV vaccines, as stated on SaneVax’s website [3]:

Question: How many faulty airbags prompted their recall?

Answer: “Four fatalities and more than 100 injuries have been linked to the Takata air bags…”

Now, here’s where we realize the obvious ill-found logic of Big Pharma’s and vaccine apologists’ religious, faith-like belief about vaccines that they can do no harm and are not responsible nor contribute to health problems, which the medical professions assert are “coincidental,” especially regarding the HPV vaccines. When in fact, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (the Vaccine Court) has paid out $39,176,070.00 in claims in Fiscal Year to Date (Dec. 2014) alone, per Page 3 of that report.

However, or perhaps, here’s where the real deal may be found: The financial spread sheet on vaccine revenues and payouts, i.e., Cumulative Results of Operations total $3,515,428,504.10. That’s over Three-and-a-half BILLION U.S. Dollars. That’s not chicken feed!

Where has that money gone? How much went to injured vaccinees? How much of the taxes collected on each and every vaccine sold, which the feds collect, does the U.S. government utilize or manage, and how? Should we question whether it is a Ponzi-like scheme that Uncle Sam operates supposedly on behalf of injured vaccinees, but winds up being operated, in most cases, against damaged vaccinees due to claims being dismissed by Vaccine Court masters? Compare the number of awards compensated (3897) with the number of payments (4912) to attorneys of dismissed cases. Where is the U.S. Congress on this, and why are they mute?

Probably, they are luxuriating in the back pockets of Big Pharma’s Capitol Hill lobbyists. Don’t believe that? Well, read what The Center for Public Integrity says:

It’s actually the pharmaceutical industry that spends the most each year to influence our lawmakers, forking over a total of $2.6 billion on lobbying activities from 1998 through 2012, according to OpenSecrets.org. [4] Emphasis added.

In 14 to 15 years, Big Pharma ‘hush money’ amounted to $2.6 BILLION!

That, alone, ought to tell anyone with an ounce of gray matter inside their cranium that money speaks louder than expository, critical, valid science. Unfortunately, lobbyists’ money also tends to make ‘religious converts’ in Congress regarding vaccine pseudoscience ‘faith dogmas’, and allows lobbyists to write vested-interest-laws for Congresspersons to introduce.

That’s undoubtedly why the U.S. Congress kowtowed to Big Pharma in 1986 and ever since, I contend. Big Pharma apparently used ‘terrorist tactics’, in a sense, as Pharma said if it didn’t procure a “Get out of jail free” card regarding ethical/legal/financial liability-free damage status for their vaccines, then they would stop making vaccines. I’d call that ‘shot gun legislation’, i.e., Put coercive monetary guns to anyone’s head and, of course, they will cave. Seemingly, Congress was a little too eager to cave, I contend, and it’s been ‘hell on earth’ for thousands, if not millions, of infants, toddlers, teens, and adults ever since 1986 when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was passed.

Subsequently, autism went from 1 in 10,000 in the late 1970s to currently 1 in 68. We now have over 90% vaccinated children in the USA [17]; 95% is targeted for supposed acquired ‘herd immunity’ status.

Alzheimer’s disease in the elderly was nowhere on the medical radar until after the medical cartel mandated senior citizens get annual flu shots and pneumococcal vaccines, both of which contain neurotoxins and toxic chemicals. Currently, there are 5.1 million Alzheimer’s patients [5]. Another thing that we didn’t have, until after the senior citizen vaccine campaigns, was lockdown Alzheimer residences.

Is there any correlation and causation going on? Possibly, and that’s what needs to be investigated by independent, non-Pharma-affiliated researchers and scientists who will produce unbiased reports not financed nor published by Big Pharma in their ‘peer review’ journals that they own, influence, and publish.

Later on you will learn how Colombia is reacting to Gardasil-vaccine-damaged girls. But, here’s more about the monetary aspects of vaccines in the USA.

ftp://ftp.publicdebt.treas.gov/dfi/tfmb/dfivi1214.pdf   Page 5

Now, let’s juxtapose the above figures against the figures taken from

Totals for FY (Fiscal Year) 1989 thru 2015

HRSA National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Statistics Report

http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreport.pdf Page 4

Personally, this writer thinks there ought to be a convincing explanation about the differences between the two figures. Maybe there even ought to be an independent audit by the Inspector General – just in case!

Now on to Colombia’s Gardasil Nightmare

According to a January 6, 2015 report on Elheraldo.co, parents of injured girls in Carmen de Bolivar were outraged when the Colombian National Institute of Health (INS) ’leaked’ the final report on their ’scientific investigation’ into the epidemic of new medical conditions occurring after the administration of the second dose of Gardasil. [6]

SaneVax published “HPV vaccine controversy in Colombia continues” [6] wherein more of the details regarding the 700 injured Gardasil HPV vaccinees appear, which readers are encouraged to read in full to appreciate what’s been going on.

The comments this writer wishes to make regarding the Colombia HPV vaccine problems include:

The Colombian Inspector General’s response is totally different from what happens in the USA where harmed vaccinees are ‘hung out to dry’ and left to fend for themselves with parents being saddled with all sorts of problems and medical bills for seriously injured, previously healthy “Gardasil girls.”

“He also requested further monitoring and timely comprehensive treatment to girls who were apparently affected by the HPV vaccine.” [6] Emphasis added.

His other recommendations can be read in the SaneVax article. But, the real clincher is that the Colombian judicial system is making certain that all those injured by this recent Gardasil health problem affecting so many young girls, who are disabled, are provided all the required treatments regardless of “whether or not the costs incurred are covered in the patient’s current health insurance program or the Public Health Plan (POS).”[6] Emphasis added.

Can you imagine that ever happening in the USA?

Incidentally, the attorney representing many Gardasil-injured girls,

Monica Leon Del Rio is no stranger to the HPV vaccine controversy. She is the mother of a young woman who experienced paralysis and various medical dysfunctions after the administration of HPV vaccine in January 2013. She is currently representing at least 50 other girls from El Carmen de Bolivar who are exhibiting new medical conditions after using HPV vaccines. Her mission is to ensure survivors of HPV vaccinations receive proper medical diagnosis and treatment. [6] Emphasis added.

Ironically and utterly distressing, the Colombia HPV vaccine disaster is not unique. Ongoing, there are equally serious health problems and concerns about HPV vaccine damage in numerous countries, e.g., Australia, Canada, Ireland [10], Spain [9], United Kingdom, France [7], Japan [8], and of course, in the USA where SaneVax is devoted to tracking the health-damaging course of events in vaccinees.

This truly makes no logical scientific or medical ethics sense at all.

Since high ranking honchos at USA federal and state health agencies apparently have been to college/university and earned degrees—usually of higher learning, one has to wonder what happens along the way that seemingly impedes administrators, medical doctors, and researchers from understanding that the prime reason for science and research is to find/research, investigate, and give expression to uncovering and exposing ideas, facts, and information that contradict not only the logic but the proprietary-science of vested interests, especially Big Pharma.

Proprietary- science ought to be outlawed! In this writer’s opinion, it’s nothing short of ‘vested interest piracy’. However, all the chemical and pharmaceutical companies get away with it hook, line, and sinker! Their ‘science’ is what federal and state agencies accept as valid when, in reality, most of it is ‘fudged’ as safe in order to sell products. Here’s a perfect example:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303277704579346430438409534 .

Furthermore, why is it required protocol to propagate the obviously apparent vested-interest-controlled pseudoscience ‘vaccine dogmas’ as if they are ‘articles of faith’—and especially under penalty of law—or suffer professional excommunication from the ‘church of medical peer status’?

Here’s a rather interesting age-old ‘professional faith and beliefs’ corollary: Socrates.

“More specifically, Socrates’ accusers cited two “impious” acts: “failing to acknowledge the gods that the city acknowledges” and “introducing new deities”.” [14]

For those not familiar with Socrates’ fate, he was required by the law at that time to drink the poisonous hemlock, which killed him.

Haven’t medicine and science learned anything from Copernicus [11], Galileo [12], and Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis [13]? Or, are they afraid that exposed and documented science will destroy their apparently greedy fiefdoms, pharmaceutical empires, and ‘house of cards’? In the meantime, globally, girls—the future mothers of tomorrow—are being sidelined from life and living by the horrendous vaccine damage caused by HPV vaccines. That has to stop. Go, Colombia, get justice!

Post Script:

After submitting this article, I received the following devastating information from Child Health Safety regarding vaccines causing sudden infant deaths. Since CHS in the UK is breaking this story, I’d like for readers to read it on their website HERE.

This information was required to be published by a Court Order in Italy.

The following information is from the PubMed publication of January 13, 2015

“The GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance’s confidential report to the Regulatory Authority on Infanrix hexa (combined Diptheria Tetanus and Acelluar Pertusis, Hepatitis B, inactivated Poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenza type B vaccine for the period 23 October 2009 to 22 October 2011 (the 15th and 16th Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR)) has been made available to the public by the Italian Court of Justice Nicola Di Leo and is now available on the internet (http://autismoevaccini.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/vaccin-dc3a9cc3a8s.pdf)”.

Truly, a ‘House of Cards’ has to come down.


[1] http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreport.pdf Page 5

[2] http://www.sgs.com/en/Our-Company/News-and-Media-Center/News-and-Press-Releases/2013/03/SGS-Informs-Customers-about-Product-Recalls-in-the-Automotive-Industry.aspx

[3] http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-controversy-colombia-continues/

[4] http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/02/11/12175/opinion-big-pharmas-stranglehold-washington

[5] http://www.alzfdn.org/AboutAlzheimers/statistics.html

[6] http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-controversy-colombia-continues/

[7] http://sanevax.org/french-petition-hpv-vaccines/

[8] http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/japan-international-medical-researchers-issue-warning-about-hpv-vaccine-side-effects/

[9] http://naturalsociety.com/first-hpv-lawsuit-filed-spain-manufacturers-health-authorities/

[10] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ireland-reports-64-cases-of-adverse-reactions-to-hpv-vaccine

[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus

[12] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei

[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis

[14] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates

[15] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176599/

[16] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510212

[17] http://www.cbsnews.com/news/most-us-children-get-vaccines-but-some-states-do-better-than-others/

Catherine retired from researching and writing, but felt compelled to write this article. 

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)


Artikel om vaccin – svininfluensan/narkolepsi

2009 var det ju en masshysteri, det sas att man var tvungen att vaccinera sig mot svininfluensa (som tur var lyckades jag låta bli), det har ställt till det ordentligt för en hel del människor, här är en berättelse om en av dom


När 21-åriga Felicia Eriksson Widberg vaknar på morgonen möts hon ofta av kaos. Det kan ligga gröt i kökslådorna, popcorn och choklad i soffan och chips över hela golvet. Felicia lider av sjukdomen narkolepsi som hon drabbades av efter vaccinationen mot svininfluensan för nästan sju år sedan. 

Narkolepsi är en livslång svår neurologisk sjukdom som bland annat påverkar regleringen av sömn och vakenhet. För att kunna hålla sig vaken på dagarna måste Felicia äta ett narkotikaklassat centralstimulerande läkemedel. För att kunna sova på natten måste hon ta Xyrem, ett starkt beroendeframkallande narkosmedel. Båda medicinerna har svåra biverkningar.

En är sömngång och för Felicia innebär det att hon vandrar runt nästan varje natt och gör tokiga, och farliga, saker.

– En gång var jag på väg ut ur lägenheten i bara trosor och vinterjacka när min kompis stoppade mig. Jag har också varit på väg ner i min kompis mammas säng. Det är jätteläskigt och pinsamt, berättar Felicia.

– En gång hade jag brett smör över en hel tidning. Jag har också satt på spisen i sömnen och kan sätta i mig allt möjligt. Det är alltid kladdigt när jag vaknar.

”All mat smakar äckligt”

Felicia tror att hon äter i sömnen för att hennes kropp skriker efter näring. Medicinerna har gjort att hon har tappat aptiten och hon har rasat kraftigt i vikt.

– All mat smakar äckligt och jag måste kämpa för att hålla vikten. När jag började med Xyrem tappade jag 22 kilo på fem månader. Till slut var jag nere på 38 kilo och orkade knappt stå upp. Jag kände mig som en zombie. Nu dricker jag näringsdryck för att inte gå ner mer.

Felicia var 14 år när hon vaccinerades med Pandemrix mot svininfluensan. Bara någon månad senare kom den förlamande tröttheten som gjorde att hon sov bort det mesta av tiden. Åren som följde har varit tuffa. Sjukdomen är mycket handikappande och trots medicineringen måste Felicia ta upp till fyra sovpauser per dag.

Påverkar det sociala livet

Hon är ständigt trött och har svårt att minnas saker och har svårt med koncentrationen. Under intervjun tappar hon tråden flera gånger och glömmer vad frågan var.

– Det här har påverkat min skolgång enormt mycket. Jag tvingades välja en lättare linje på gymnasiet för jag klarade inte att läsa den högskoleförberedande linje som jag ville gå. Trots det var jag tvungen att läsa ett extra år för jag klarade inte att läsa den yrkesförberedande linjen heller, säger Felicia.

Sjukdomen har även haft stor inverkan på Felicias fritid och sociala liv. Från att ha varit en pigg tjej som red och boxades och hade många kompisar är hon idag mest hemma ensam. Orken räcker inte till mycket mer än att läsa in de gymnasiekurser hon saknar och hon har tappat kontakten med många av vännerna.

– Det är ju inte konstigt att man förlorar vänner om man inte orkar göra någonting säger hon och tystnar.

Hon kämpar en stund mot tårarna, samlar sig och fortsätter:

– När jag bara somnade när de kom hem till mig.

”Känns för jäkligt”

Det är ingen överdrift att påstå att narkolepsin har slagit sönder hela Felicias liv.

– Hade jag kunnat spola tillbaka tiden hade jag hellre chansat och dött i svininfluensan än att ha det som det är nu. Det är jättejobbigt att behöva leva så här och att aldrig någonsin få känna sig pigg. Jag är trött på att vara trött och jag oroar mig för framtiden. Jag har ingen aning om hur det kommer att gå för mig och om jag kommer att kunna försörja mig. Vad händer om jag inte kan det? Kommer jag få någon hjälp? Hittills har det ju inte hänt någonting så jag förväntar mig inte speciellt mycket, säger Felicia.

Hon är arg och besviken på de politiker och myndigheter som var ansvariga för massvaccinationen. Hon tycker att de har svikit henne och alla dem andra drygt 300 personerna som drabbades av narkolepsi efter sprutan.

– Det känns för jäkligt. Först går man ut och säger att det är jätteviktigt att alla ska vaccinera sig och när sedan det här händer är det ingen som bryr sig eller som tar sitt ansvar eller ger oss stöd. De har inte ens bett om ursäkt. Förutom att vi ska klara vardagen med den här svåra sjukdomen måste vi också klara av att kämpa för våra rättigheter. Det tog till exempel fyra ansökningar och avslag innan jag fick rätt till färdtjänst. Vi får slåss mot försäkringskassan, mot läkemedelsförsäkringen och mot vårdpersonal som har bristande kunskaper om narkolepsi. Vi blir hela tiden ifrågasatta och känner oss övergivna av samhället.

Drömmer ändå om framtiden

Läkemedelsförsäkringen har klassat Felicias narkolepsi som en läkemedelsskada men hitintills har hon bara fått 50.000 kronor i ersättning för sveda och värk.

– Det är ju ingenting vi borde ha fått betydligt mer. Det har ändå gått sju år nu. Och de där tio miljonerna som dem har pratat om, som vi skulle kunna få i ersättning för inkomstbortfall har vi inte heller sett röken av. Det är inte ens säkert att de pengarna skulle räcka för att kompensera oss ända till och med pensionen. Dessutom kräver Läkemedelsförsäkringen att vi skriver på en överlåtelsehandling där vi förbinder oss att inte stämma läkemedelsbolaget eller staten. Annars kan vi inte få några pengar från dem. Det borde inte få gå till så. Men många tror att vi är miljonärer nu och det är helt sjukt, säger Felicia.

Oron för framtiden är stor men Felicia hyser ändå en förhoppning om att i långsam takt kunna läsa upp betygen så att hon kan förverkliga drömmen att bli läkare.

– Jag vill bli neurolog eftersom jag ofrivilligt har tvingats bli intresserad av den här typen av sjukdomar. Bristen på neurologer som är kunniga på narkolepsi är ganska stor så varför inte göra någonting bra av det dåliga?

Artiklar om Dr Andrew Wakefield (vaccin/autism)

Ytterligare en artikel om vaccin – den här gången om Dr Andrew Wakefield som var regissör för filmen Vaxxed, och också en av de som blev intervjuade i Ty Bollingers serie “The truth about vaccines”. Det finns också en video att se, om man klickar på länken här nedan.


Svensk dokumentär om dr Andrew Wakefield som fann en koppling mellan trippelvaccin och autism

PREMIÄR. Dr Andrew Wakefield intervjuas i ett samarbete med journalisten Celia Farber i New York. Syftet är att beskriva hur media, svensk public service och forskarsamhället i allmänhet behandlat upptäckten av kopplingen mellan trippelvaccin för barn, kroniska tarmproblem och autism.

Text: Torbjörn Sassersson | Premiär 29 aug 2014 | Se artiklar om Wakefield

Premiären av dokumentären med Wakefield kommer i samband med att forskaren dr William Thompson vid amerikanska myndigheten CDC den 25 augusti 2014 avslöjar att CDC under många år dolt information inför den medicinska världen och allmänheten att risken för barn att drabbas av autism ökar flerfaldigt vid trippelvaccinering. Särskilt drabbade är svarta barn.

Reaktionen inom etablissemanget, public service, myndighetsvärlden, medicinjournalistiken och skolmedicinen kan beskrivas med ett ord: vaccinriskförnekelse.

Smutskastningskampanj genom ”public service”

Den smutskastningskampanj som dr Andrew Wakefield utsatts för kan betecknas som en av de mest omfattande mot en enskild person i modern tid. Den har pågått i över 15 år och spänner över tidningar, webben, TV, radio och Wikipedia etc. Enorma ekonomiska intressen står på spel för läkemedelsindustrin som befarar att övertron mot vaccin ska ersättas av kunskap om riskerna med vaccin och hur ineffektiva de egentligen är. Myndigheter uttrycker mest en oro för en nedsatt så kallad ”vaccinationstäckning”. Denna oro är inte baserad på en fast vetenskaplig grund.

De svenska journalister inom gammelmedia som varit mest aggressiva mot Wakefield är Inger Atterstam på SvD och Karin Bojs på DN (sök bland artiklar på NewsVoice). I övrigt har SVT och Granskningsnämnden kraftigt bidragit till en orättvis behandling av och förvillande uppfattning om Wakefield och hans vetenskapliga fynd.

Produktion: NewsVoice, Sasser Media Lab
Intervju: Celia Farber
Kamera: Francesca Alesse, redaktör på Aljazeera America
Redigering och ljud: Pål Bergström
Produktions-team: Linda Karlström (Vaccin.me), Marina Ahlm (Vaccin.me), Marina Szöges (Dagens Homeopati), Ann-Charlotte Stewart, Torbjörn Sassersson (NewsVoice.se)

Och en till artikel (och man hittar också en video genom att klicka på länken):


Mpr-vaccinet kan starta en autoimmun reaktion – Wakefields fynd om sambandet mellan tarmskador och autism bekräftat

16 februari, 2014 By 

År 1998 publicerade dr Andrew Wakefield och hans kollegor en studie som undersökte 12 barn med neurologisk fördröjning. Studien, ofta refererad till som Lancet 12, orsakade stor uppståndelse eftersom föräldrarna till barnen i studien påpekade att barnens problem uppstått i samband med mpr-vaccinationen. Wakefield upptäckte att barnen led av skador i tarmarna, vilket gjorde att proteiner som orsakar hjärnsjukdom kunde komma ut i blodomloppet. Hans fynd har nyligen bekräftats av en mycket stor studie som konstaterade att barn med autism hade förstoppning, diarré och en känslighet för olika livsmedel sex till åtta gånger oftare än barn som utvecklades normalt.

Text: Marina Ahlm    Bild: Studie gjord av Thompson och Wakefield år 1995

Wakefield upptäckte i samband med sin studie att mpr-vaccin kunde ha en möjlig koppling till barnens tarminflammation och förlust av tarmens barriärfunktion, vilket gjorde att encefalopatiska (orsakar hjärnsjukdom) proteiner kunde komma ut i blodomloppet. Detta var därmed en faktor i utvecklingen av neuropsykiatriska funktionshinder. Dr Wakefield beskrev 12 barn med neurologisk fördröjning varav 8 hade autism. Alla dessa barn hade magbesvär och hade utvecklat autism i samband med mpr-vaccinet, enligt föräldrarnas utsago.

Dr Wakefield hade redan innan studien varit kritisk mot kombinationsvaccinet mot mässling, påssjuka och röda hund. Han gjorde därför rekommendationen att återgå till att ge mässlingsvaccinet som singeldos. Anledningen till detta var att efter introduktionen av kombinationsvaccinet drabbades ovanligt många barn av allvarliga biverkningar som encefalit (hjärninflammation) och meningit (hjärnhinneinflammation). Vaccinet slutade användas år 1992 i Japan där man återgick till att använda singeldoser. I Kanada drog man också tillbaka en typ av mpr-vaccin och 1993 bytte man ut det befintliga vaccinet i Storbritannien mot ett annat. Wakefield var dock inte övertygad om att detta vaccin var säkrare än det föregående. Hans oro för detta har bekräftats av andra (1).

År 2002 publicerade Wakefield och hans medarbetare en studie som undersöker förhållandet mellan mässlingsvirus och autism. Författarna testade tarmbiopsiprover för förekomst av mässlingsvirus från barn med och utan autism.  75 av 90 barn med autism befanns ha virusgenom från mässling i tarmvävnad, jämfört med endast 5 av 70 kontrollpatienter.

Kritiken mot detta blev att eftersom mässlingsvaccinets virus är levande och försvagade så innebär det att vaccinviruset replikerar sig 15-20 gånger efter vaccinationen. Om man nu vet att virus muterar, även om de kommer från ett vaccin, hur kan man vara säker på att dessa muterade virus inte utgör någon sjukdomsrisk? Vaccinviruset lär alltså med all sannolikhet komma att tas upp av specifika celler som ansvarar för virusupptag, och färdas vidare i kroppen. Därmed kan de detekteras i intestinala (tarm-) vävnader. Kritikerna tyckte också att eftersom naturliga mässlingsvirus fortfarande cirkulerar i England, hade det varit viktigt att fastställa om mässlingsviruset var naturligt mässlingsvirus eller vaccinvirus (2).

Det är en intressant aspekt med tanke på att det vid olika utbrott av vaccinerbara sjukdomar sällan undersöks huruvida utbrottet härstammar från vaccinvirus eller vilt virus. I länder där det levande poliovaccinet används är det däremot allmänt känt att vaccinet i sig själv leder till att virus muterar och sprids i det vilda (3)(4). Kikhosta drabbar numera ofta välvaccinerade populationer och en studie har visat att bakterien muterat och blivit resistent mot vaccinet (5). Intressant är att en del forskare hävdar att viruset muterat redan för 20 år sedan, vilket skulle innebära att alla som vaccinerats under denna tid varit helt oskyddade mot den vilda formen av kikhostebakterien (6). Mellan 2009 och 2010 hade USA ett utbrott av påssjuka med 3 502 bekräftade fall. Av dessa studerade man 1 648 fall och fann att 89 procent av dessa hade fått två doser av vaccinet. Utbrottet spårades till en 11-årig pojke som dessutom var vaccinerad (7).  Att vacciner inte kan kontrollera virus är helt uppenbart.

År 2003 publicerades en studie som visade att virus-inducerad autoimmunitet kan spela en avgörande roll i autism. Forskarna fann antikroppar mot en antigen i mässlingsviruset, något som återfanns i 83 procent av autistiska barn men inte i normala barn eller syskon till autistiska barn. Slutsatsen blev att autistiska barn kan överreagera på mässlingsvirus vilket i avsaknad av en vild typ av mässlingsinfektion kan vara ett tecken på en onormal immunreaktion mot vaccinstammen eller virusreaktivering (8).

MINE – den nya degenerativa sjukdomen i vaccinerade barn

År 2004 publicerades en artikel i Journal of Pediatric Neurology vilken beskriver hur reduceringen av mässling i  USA visat sig ha en signifikant konsekvens i form av en ny neurodegenerativ sjukdom, MINE-syndrom (Measles-Induced Neuroautistic Encephalopathy). MINE har samma konstellation av symtom som autism. Det är en variant av SSPE (Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis) som är en allvarlig men ytterst sällsynt komplikation efter en mässlingsinfektion (har även uppkommit i vaccinerade). Orsaken till uppkomsten är inte helt klarlagd men av någon anledning klarar inte kroppen av att ta hand om viruset som då ligger kvar i kroppen och senare kan orsaka skada.

Innan införandet  av mässlingsvaccinet rapporterades det över 500 000 fall av mässling varje år i USA. Under samma tidpunkt uppkom det årligen 60 fall av SSPE och de senaste åren har det endast rapporterats runt 5 fall per år. I relation till detta har det sedan slutet av 1990-talet  varit över 2 000 barn som diagnosticerats med MINE och tusentals fler med autism. Gemensamt för dessa barn är att de alla fått mpr-vaccin. Inget barn uppvisade några symtom innan vaccinering. Vid blodprov uppvisade alla vaccinstammar från mässling. Alla autistiska symtom uppstod flera månader efter vaccinering (vilket är vanligt för ”långsamma virus” som mässlingsviruset) och alla har haft symtom som tytt på immunologiska problem, t ex allergier, eksem och upprepade infektioner (9). 

År 2009 skrev Vijendra K. Singh en undersökande artikel där han beskriver autoimmunitet som den största faktorn för utvecklandet av autism.  En stor sannolik faktor för utvecklandet av autoimmunitet är mässling, antingen från en latent infektion eller från mpr-vaccinet. På något sätt tar sig viruset förbi blod-hjärnbarriären och skadar hjärnans myelin genom att starta en autoimmun reaktion. Myelinet har en isolerande förmåga på nervcellerna vilket gör att en nervimpuls kan fortplanta sig snabbare. Efter att denna artikel publicerats skrev 152 familjer och berättade om sin upplevelse av autism. Cirka 52 procent menade att de autistiska symtomen började efter mpr-vaccinet, 33 procent efter dtp-vaccinet, 8 procent berättade att det fanns en koppling till vaccinering men de kunde inte säga vilken, och 7 procent sade att de inte märkt något samband med vaccinering.

Men för att återgå till Wakefields fynd så har en nyligen publicerad studie av forskare vid UC Davis MIND Institute, visat att Andrew Wakefield hade rätt vad gäller samband mellan neuropsykiatriska tillstånd, som autism, och gastrointestinala problem (GI). Studien heter ”Gastrointestinala problem hos barn med autism, försenad utveckling eller typisk utveckling” och publicerades i Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

I studien upptäcktes det att barn med autism hade förstoppning, diarré och en känslighet för olika livsmedel sex till åtta gånger oftare än hos barn som utvecklades normalt. Symtomen var relaterade till beteendeproblem, inklusive socialt tillbakadragande, irritabilitet och repetitivt beteende. Undersökningen som jämför GI-problem hos barn med autism, utvecklingsförsening och typisk (normal) utveckling är den hittills största som gjorts, med en stor etnisk spridning.

Föräldrar till barn med autism har länge sagt att deras barn har kraftiga GI-problem men lite anses känt om vad som orsakar vilket. GI-problem kan skapa beteendeproblem  och dessa beteendeproblem kan skapa eller förvärra GI-problem. Forskarna tog inte upp varför barnen med autism och utvecklingsförsening upplevt mer GI-problem . De noterade att deras resultat tyder på att ämnet förtjänar ytterligare utredning (11).


1. Pediatric MMR Vaccination Safety – Mark R. Geier, MD, PhD; David A Geier


3. Polio Surge In Nigeria After Vaccine Virus Mutates – Maria Cheng

4. Long-term circulation of vaccine-derived poliovirus that causes paralytic disease – J Virol. 2002 Jul;76(13):6791-9

5. U.S. health officials find potentially vaccine-resistant whopping cough – Vaccine News Daily

6. Concerns Raised Over Whopping Cough Vaccin’s Potency – ABC News

7.  Mumps Outbreak in Orthodox Jewish Communities in the United States – NEJM

8. Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism – Pediatr Neurol. 2003 Apr;28(4):292-4

9. Some aspects about the clinical and pathogenetic characteristics of the presumed persistent measles infections: SSPE and MINE – Journal of Pediatric Neurology, Vol. 2, No. 3, July-Sept, 2004, pp. 121-124

10. A major subset of autism  – AnnAls of CliniCAl PsyChiAtry 2009;21(3):148-161 

11. Children who have autism far more likely to have tummy troubles – ScienceDaily

Läs mer

Link found between measles virus and gut abnormalities in children with developmental disorder – Journal of Clinical Pathology

Regressive behavioral disorder diagnosis – Wakefields patent US6534259 B1

Testimony before congressional oversight commitee on autism and immunisation – John J. O´Leary

The MMR question – Correnspondence The Lancet

New research links measles, autistic gut disorders – Autism research review international

Fourteen studies 

We support Dr. Andrew Wakefield

New Published Study Verifies Andrew Wakefield´s Research on Autism – Again (MMR Vaccine Causes Autism)

”That Paper” By Andrew Wakefield

The history of MMR´s safety

The following peer-reviewed papers support the findings of the original work by Wakefield and colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in the UK


Fler exempel på vaccinationer som kan sprida smitta

A case of yellow fever vaccine-associated disease – The New Zealand Medical Journal

Rotavirus vaccines: viral shedding and risk for transmission – The Lancet

Chickenpox The Disease & The Vaccine Fact Sheet – NVIC


Vaccinföreläsning med Ann-Charlotte Stewart

Just nu är det lite vaccintema på mina blogginlägg, det finns mycket att säga, och det är viktigt att sprida information om vad vacciner kan ställa till med. Nu tänkte jag dela Ann-Charlotte Stewarts föreläsning om vacciner, hon är specialist på Gardasil, men har en hel del att säga om andra vacciner också. Föreläsningen är uppdelad på fyra olika videos, här är dom:

Här är texten som är publicerad på youtube om den här delen av föreläsningen:
“Ann-Charlotte Stewart är doktor i medicinsk genetik och disputerade 1993 i ämnet papillomvirus och livmoderhalscancer. Hon har en postdoc i USA, och forskade på livmoderhalscancer/HPV vid University of New Mexico. Ann-Charlotte Stewart berättar om varför hon hoppade av mitt i en lovande karriär. Vi tycks bli allt sjukare med degenerativa sjukdomar och autoimmuna sjukdomar. Ann-Charlotte berättar vad som hände historiskt då kostnaden för vacciner ökade, liksom om de stadigt växande biverkningarna vilket i förlängningen löstes genom att vaccinbolagen fick immunitet mot skadestånd. Kända biverkningar av vaccin. Vi får se utdrag från bipacksedeln av GMO-vaccin/Hepatit B. Barn till och med dör inom timmar/dagar efter vaccination. “Trots att vi har den största konsumtionen av antibiotika och vacciner hos alla grupper av barn historiskt så är våra barn fetare, sjukare och dummare än någonsin” citat Dr Tim O´Shea.”

Youtubetext del 2:
“Ann-Charlotte pratar om det allmänna barnvaccinationsprogrammet, hur det ser ut – visste du att det är frivilligt? Vad innehåller vacciner? Varför innehåller vaccin antigener och adjuvanser? Ann-Charlotte kommer in på aluminium. Tiomersal och svininfluensan 2009, samt autism. Är vacciner säkra och effektiva?”

Youtubetext del 3:
“Är det verkligen vaccinernas förtjänst att dödsfallen har gått ner i olika sjukdomar som vi vaccinerar mot som kikhosta, polio, mässling. Ann-Charlotte går på djupet vad gäller HPV och HPV-vaccin, som hon har forskat inom. Gardasil ger många svåra biverkningar, även dödsfall. Örebro Läns Landsting ändrar på sin hemsida angående Gardasil på Ann-Charlottes anmodan. Vaccinerade versus ovaccinerade. Vad det gäller mikrober så är miljön är allt!”

Youtubetext del 4:
“Vad försvagar immunförsvaret? Vad stärker immunförsvaret? Vad behöver vi och vad ska vi göra för att få bättre immunförsvar och bättre hälsa? Lästips för den som vill fördjupa sig i ämnet.”

För att hitta mer info om Ann-Charlotte Stewart kan man få tag på henne via hennes Facebookprofil https://www.facebook.com/anncharlotte.stewart
googlar man på hennes namn så finns det tyvärr en massa hemsidor med svartmålning och misskreditering, VOF-folket försöker göra vad dom kan för att mörka och gömma undan sån här information.

Article about the Salk polio vaccine tragedy

I have been following the discussion about vaccines for a while now, if you have a chance to watch Ty Bollingers videos “The truth about vaccines” I urge you to do it – really important information!
One of the (many) things they talked about was the polio vaccine – here’s an article about that…


History is a powerful thing. If you accurately tell the story of an event that occurred, you get one picture, one understanding of it. Leave one tiny little detail out, however, and the whole picture changes. You can get thousands of details right, but get one wrong, or simply omit telling it, and an historical event can become so distorted that it becomes a lie. Take the story of the Salk inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). During the first half of the 1950s, Jonas Salk, MD developed the first injectable vaccine against polio containing inactivated, or “killed”, strains of the poliovirus.

As a dead, rather than live, virus vaccine, Dr. Salk’s IPV supposedly carried no risk of giving recipients “vaccine-associated polio paralysis.”1 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “IPV is produced from wild-type poliovirus strains of each serotype that have been inactivated (killed) with formalin.”2

Here’s that little detail, though. The poliovirus that Dr. Salk killed with formalin, or formaldehyde, were not always killed; they sometimes only appeared to be killed.

Live poliovirus, which was put in an injectable vaccine, would appear to be inactivated right after it was made, but sometimes it would ‘resurrect’ in the vial… In essence, the formaldehyde did not kill off all the polioviruses in these vaccines, which led to live polio viruses being injected. As a result, more people developed paralysis from the vaccine in 1955 than would have developed it from a wild, normal natural poliovirus.3


Field trials for the Salk vaccine were conducted on more than 1,800,000 children in the United States in 1954.4 Sponsored by the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (NFIP), now known as the March of Dimes, “623,972 schoolchildren were injected with vaccine or placebo, and more than a million others participated as ‘observed’ controls.’5

On April 12, 1955, Thomas Francis Jr., MD, director of the Poliomyelitis Vaccine Evaluation Center at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, announced to the world that the Salk vaccine was “safe, effective, and potent,”—that it was “up to 90%” effective in preventing paralytic polio. Dr. Francis had been one of Dr. Salk’s professors at the University of Michigan’s School of Public Health Department of Epidemiology where Salk did his postgraduate training.4

During mid-April of 1955, about 400,000 people—mostly schoolchildren—in the U.S. were vaccinated with the Salk vaccine manufactured by Cutter Laboratories.6 It turns out that more than 200,000 of these children, living in five western and midwestern states (Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada and New Mexico7), were injected with vaccines “in which the process of inactivating the live virus proved to be defective.” The Cutter-produced vaccines ended up causing 40,000 cases of polio. It severely paralyzed 200 children and killed 10.8

The first of these cases to be reported was that of a young girl named Susan Pierce, who had received the vaccine on April 18, 1955.7

Five days later, she developed fever and neck stiffness. Six days later, her left arm was paralyzed. Seven days later, she was placed in an iron lung, and nine days later, she was dead.7

In his book The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis, Paul Offit, MD writes, “Seventy-five percent of Cutter’s victims were paralyzed for the rest of their lives.” A team led by epidemiologisit Alexander Langmuir of the Communicable Diseases Center (now the CDC) in Atlanta, GA determined that “the disease caused by Cutter’s vaccine was worse than the disease caused by natural polio virus,” adds Dr. Offit.7

Children given Cutter’s vaccine were more likely to be paralyzed in their arms, more likely to suffer severe and permanent paralysis, more likely to require breathing assistance in iron lungs, and more likely to die than children naturally infected with polio.7

The so-called “Cutter Incident” led to the recall of the Cutter vaccine and the eventual replacement of the Salk IPV with the attenuated (weakened) live oral polio vaccine (OPV) developed by Albert Sabin, MD and introduced in 1963. (A modified inactivated Salk vaccine was re-introduced in the 1990s after the only cases of polio occurring in the U.S. were vaccine strain polio cases because live OPV can cause vaccine strain polio in the recipient or a close contact of a recently vaccinated person shedding live vaccine strain polio virus in body fluids.)8

But the fact that some improperly inactivated lots of the original polio vaccine paralyzed and killed American children was concealed from the public for a long time.

In their book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk write, “You may be wondering how this information was concealed from the public for nearly fifty years. Congressman Percy Priest ordered and chaired a full investigation of the vaccine controversy.”)9 According to them, Congressman Priest, who represented the 6th District of Tennessee, admitted in 1956 that,

… in the previous year (1955) many responsible persons had felt that the public should be spared the ordeal of ‘knowledge about controversy.’ If word ever got out that the Public Health Service had actually done something damaging to the health of the American people, the consequences would b terrible… We felt that no lasting good could come to science or the public if the Public Health Services were discredited.”9

Two key points to note here. First, the problem with the Cutter-produced vaccine should have come as a surprise to the scientists and public health officials who were familiar with the development of the Salk IPV. According to Dr. Humphries and Bystrianyk:

The Salk invention was an injectable, supposedly formaldehyde-inactivated version of poliovirus vaccine. There were serious problems with the viral inactivation process that were known by insiders from the outset of the vaccine’s development.9

Unfortunately, whenever scientists involved in the vaccine’s development raised concerns that poliovirus had not been fully killed, they were “rapidly subdued.”9

As a result of ignoring the warnings by highly qualified scientists who repeatedly and publicly explained why and how the inactivation process was flawed from the beginning, the vaccine virus needlessly infected, paralyzed, and killed children and their household contacts.9

Secondly, Cutter Laboratories was not the only manufacturer of the the Salk IPV. Wyeth Laboratories also produced a defective Salk vaccine that caused paralysis. Other pharmaceutical companies are believed to have done so, as well. But only Cutter’s vaccine was recalled. This means that, potentially, tens of millions of doses of improperly inactivated “live” Salk vaccine were sold and injected into children in the U.S. and around the world until the “inactivated” Salk vaccine was replaced by the live oral Sabin vaccine in the early-1960s.

This may help explain, at least partially, why the cases of polio in the U.S. increased by 50% from 1957 to 1958, and by 80% between 1958 and 1959.10 According to Bernard Greenberg, PhD, head of the Department of Biostatistics at the University of North Carolina School of Public Health:

In five New England states cases of polio roughly doubled after polio vaccine was introduced. Nevertheless in the midst of the polio panic of the 1950s, with pressure to find a magic bullet, statistics were manipulated by health authorities to give the quite the opposite impression.10

Keep in mind that these dramatic increases in polio following the introduction of the Salk IPV occurred shortly after the U.S. government had already significantly relaxed its guidelines for diagnosing polio. In 1954, the government redefined polio. I wrote about this other little detail of history that has been widely overlooked in my article “Polio Wasn’t Vanquished, It Was Redefined.”11 Dr. Greenberg explained this classic example of government sleight of hand…

In order to qualify for classification as paralytic poliomyelitis, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days after the onset of the disease. Prior to 1954, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours. Laboratory confirmation and the presence of residual paralysis were not required. After 1954, residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days and again 50 to 70 days after the onset of the disease. This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer lasting paralysis.12

We can only imagine how much worse the official number of polio cases would have been during the second half of the 1950s had the same diagnosis standard continued to be followed, rather than arbitrarily changed in midstream. By any measure, the early Salk polio vaccine campaigns cannot be termed an unqualified “success.” Yet, since the story has been so repeatedly, utterly inaccurately told, our understanding of the history of the polio vaccine “miracle” is that it is one of the greatest scientific achievements of all time. And, as we have seen with the Sabin live oral polio vaccine that continues to cause vaccine strain polio cases around the world, there are big questions about how high the price has been—and will continue to be—for using that polio vaccine as well.

History is indeed a powerful thing. If you teach it wrong for more than half a century, it is hard to unteach, because a particular version of a story can become so ingrained in the public’s collective memory that few can accept that what we’ve come to believe to be an unquestioned scientific truth is, in fact, a myth.

And if that sacred cow is an illusion, then what else may we have gotten wrong along the way? Suddenly, mainstream vaccine science doesn’t feel so certain, so… scientific.


1 Polio Global Eradication Initiative. Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). polioeradication.org.
2 World Health Organization. Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). WHO.int
3 Mercola J. The Forgotten History of Vaccinations You Need to Be Aware Of. Mercola.com Jan. 18, 2015.
4 University of Michigan School of Public Health. 1955 Polio Vaccine Trial Announcement. sph.umich.edu.
5 Meldrum M. “A calculated risk”: the Salk polio vaccine field trials of 1954BMJ Oct. 31, 1998; 317(7167): 1233–1236.
6 Nathanson N, Langmuir AD. The Cutter Incident: Poliomyelitis Following Formaldehyde-Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccination in the United States During the Spring of 1955Am J Epidemiol Mar. 12, 1963.
7 Offit P. The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis. 2005, p 84.
8 Fitzpatrick M. The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine CrisisJ R Soc Med March 2006; 99(3): 156.
9 Humphries S, Bystrianyk R. Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History. July 27, 2013.
10 Chaitow L. Vaccination and Immunisation: Dangers, Delusions and Alternatives. 1998, p. 55.
11 Cáceres M. Polio Wasn’t Vanquished, It Was RedefinedThe Vaccine Reaction July 9, 2015.
12 James W. Immunization The Reality Behind the Myth. 1995, p. 36.


Perhaps the most egregious example of clever sleight of hand (… not to mention the outright, blatant rewriting of history) on the part of public health officials in the United States occurred in 1954 when the U.S. government changed the diagnostic criteria for polio.1 It was the year that medical researcher and virologist Jonas Salk produced his inactivated injectable polio vaccine ((IPV). The vaccine was licensed in 1955 and began to be used to inoculate millions of children against polio.

The Salk vaccine has been widely hailed as the vanquisher of polio, and it is commonly used as the shining example of how vaccines are the miracle drugs for combating infectious diseases… and now even against diseases that are not infectious. Pick any disease, illness or disorder you want. You got cancer, cholera, peanut allergies, stress, obesity… we’ll develop a vaccine for it.

What the apologists for the Salk vaccine regurgitate from a common script (… some might say scripture) is that before the vaccine was introduced and tested on one million children—the so-called “Polio Pioneers”—in 19542 more than 50,000 people in the U.S. were contracting polio each year, and that by the end of the 1950s the numbers were down to less than 10,000.3 Ergo, the Salk vaccine saved the U.S. from polio. Open and shut case.

Hmm, not so fast.

What is conveniently omitted from this heroic story is that the reason the number of polio cases in the U.S. dropped so precipitously following the mass introduction of the Salk vaccine in 1955 was not medical, but rather administrative. Yes it’s true, in 1952 there were 52,879 reported cases of polio in the U.S. And yes, in 1955 the number went down to 28,985, and by 1959 it had dropped to 8,425.3But first of all, it’s important to note that the numbers were already declining significantly prior to the initial use of the Salk vaccine. In 1953, there were 35,592 cases of polio in the U.S.3 So there were other things going on in the U.S. at the time totally unrelated to the Salk vaccine.

More importantly, though, in 1954 the U.S. government simply redefined polio. Yes, the government can do that. It does this kind of stuff occasionally in order to help it meet its public policy objectives when it is unable to actually achieve them. How often have you heard of Congress playing smoke and mirrors, gimmicks with the national budget deficit, or on the issue of the unemployment rate? Exactly.

When it comes to government and public policy, the truth is seldom absolute. That’s just the nature of the beast.

According to Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Department of Biostatistics of the University of North Carolina School of Public Health:

In order to qualify for classification as paralytic poliomyelitis, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days after the onset of the disease. Prior to 1954, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours. Laboratory confirmation and the presence of residual paralysis were not required. After 1954, residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days and again 50 to 70 days after the onset of the disease. This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer lasting paralysis.1

As I wrote in my piece “The Salk ‘Miracle’ Myth“…

Under the new definition of polio, thousands of cases which would have previously been counted as polio would no longer be counted as polio. The change in the definition laid the groundwork for creating the impression that the Salk vaccine was effective.4

So as radio broadcaster Paul Harvey used to say for decades at the close of each of his charming commentaries, “And now you know… the rest of the story.”


1 James W. Immunization The Reality Behind the Myth. p. 36.
2 About Jonas Salk. The Salk Institute for Biological Studies N.d.
3 The College of Physicians of Philadelphia. U.S. Polio Cases 1952-1962. The History of Vaccines.
4 Cáceres M. The Salk ‘Miracle’ MythThe Vaccine Reaction June 2, 2015.


The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed two cases of vaccine-derived poliovirus type 1 (cVDPV1) in the Ukraine. The cases involved a four-year old child and a 10-month old child in the Zakarpatskaya region of southwestern Ukraine. The onset of paralysis occurred on June 30 and July 7, 2015.1 According to the WHO, the emergence of cVDPV1 was due to “inadequate vaccination coverage” in the Ukraine, as “only 50% of children [in the country] were fully immunized against polio and other vaccine-preventable diseases.”1

Interestingly, the cVDPV1, which is a rare, mutated form of the poliovirus, is caused by the oral polio vaccine itself. A recent article in The Washington Post by Ariana Eunjung Cha notes:

Oral polio vaccines contain a weakened form of the virus that activates an immune response in the body so that it builds up antibodies to protect itself. But it takes some time for this to happen, and meanwhile the virus replicates in the intestines and can be excreted by the person immunized and can spread to others in the community.2

So the take-away point here—or at least the one that logically might elicit the most concern—should be the fact that people vaccinated against the virus can actually excrete (or “shed”) the virus and infect other people. Of course, this is counter-intuitive, because that would mean that vaccinating people to prevent infectious diseases from spreading might actually have the opposite effect.

Sometimes the weakened vaccine strain live virus can mutate and regain virulence, including neurovirulence, which significantly raises risks of serious complications from vaccine strain virus infection. Healthy persons can suffer complications from vaccine strain viral infection but children and adults with immunodeficiency are more likely to develop complications after they receive live virus vaccines or come in close contact with a person who is shedding vaccine strain live virus.3

Just like people with viral infections can shed and transmit wild-type virus, people given live virus vaccines can shed and transmit vaccine strain live attenuated virus. Like wild-type virus, vaccine strain live virus can be shed in body fluids, such as saliva, nasal and throat secretions, breastmilk, urine and blood, stool, and skin lesions. Shedding after vaccination with live virus vaccines may continue for days, weeks or months, depending upon the vaccine and the health or other individual host factors of the vaccinated person.4

Now, there’s your newsworthy story.

Instead, the story is seemingly being manipulated in a way that attributes the paralysis of the two children, not on the vaccine which led to the cVDPV1, but to the idea that in under-vaccinated populations “the vaccine-virus can circulate for long time, 12 months or longer, and genetically change into a more virulent form that can paralyze.”2  This makes it easier for the WHO and other health authorities to make their case for increasingly higher levels of vaccination. The WHO stresses that the “emergence of cVDPV strains underscores the importance of maintaining high levels of routine vaccination coverage.”1

The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has joined the WHO in calling for parents in the Ukraine to vaccinate following the confirmed polio outbreak.5  Remember now, we’re talking about twochildren. Two. An article by the United Nations News Centre references a press release by UNICEF…

‘The only effective way to protect children from polio is vaccination,’ stressed UNICEF’s representative in Ukraine, Giovanna Barberis, in a press release. ‘The available vaccines supplied by UNICEF should be used as soon as possible to ensure children are protected from polio in Ukraine.’5

The world’s major media sources are taking their cues directly from the WHO without even bothering to ask the painfully obvious question, “Isn’t it a serious problem when you have vaccines causing viruses to mutate and become more dangerous than the original viruses they were designed to protect against?” The second paragraph of the Reuters story by Tom Miles, for example, reads, “The WHO said Ukraine had been at particular risk of an outbreak because of inadequate vaccination coverage. In 2014, only 50 percent of children were fully immunized against polio and other preventable diseases, it said.”6

The second paragraph of the Associated Press (AP) story reads, “Health officials have warned for years that Ukraine was at risk of a polio epidemic because of low vaccination rates. The supply of vaccine has been spotty because of corruption and inefficiency, and many parents resist vaccinating their children because of fears about the procedure.” Another version goes, “Health officials had warned Ukraine was at high risk of a polio outbreak due to its low vaccination rates; only half of children were immunized against diseases like polio last year.”

So naturally many major newspapers simply reprint this and disseminate it to their audiences, stamping the piece with their own unique headline. There’s the Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s “Ukraine: sufficient vaccine coming to block polio outbreak.”7  There’s the Minneapolis Star Tribune’s “World Health Organization: 2 polio cases found in Ukraine, caused by mutated virus in vaccine.”8

Then there are those publications like Forbes that actually go to the trouble of writing their own story, using the material provided by the WHO and the AP. They not only repeat the party line within their article, but actually feature it in their headline: “Polio Outbreak In Ukraine Is Grim Reminder Of Need For Continued Vigilance.”9

Predictably, the second paragraph reads:

The outbreak in Ukraine arose from vaccinations in country, World Health Organization spokesman Oliver Rosenbauer explained by email, ‘This strain arose in Ukraine, due to significant vaccination coverage gaps in the country. As many as 50% of children are under- or unimmunized, so there are many susceptible children, and this increases the risk of polio re-emerging or being re-introduced. This further underscores the danger of polio until it is eradicated completely. The best thing countries can do to protect themselves is to maintain high vaccination coverage.’9

To his credit, Donald G. McNeil Jr. of The New York Times started his piece “Polio Paralyzes 2 Children in West Ukraine Outbreak” with a more substantive focus. The third and fourth paragraph go as follows:

The two children, an infant and a 4-year-old, were not paralyzed by the “wild-type virus” that is now known to be circulating only in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but by a strain derived from the oral polio vaccine itself.10

The oral vaccine contains three strains of weakened live virus, and very occasionally—the WHO estimates it as once in a million vaccinations—one mutates to become more virulent. Then, like wild virus, it can be shed in feces and spread to others in sewage.10

Ironically, despite the WHO’s confirmation, it’s not even clear yet that the two cases in the Ukraine are polio. A Russia Today (RT) report cites local authorities in the country as denying a “definitive diagnosis” of polio. According to RT:

[The polio diagnosis] ‘was not confirmed’ by medical trials in Kiev and Moscow. Regional officials told Ukrainian media the symptoms only ‘resembled’ polio, but it could in fact be acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), recorded in the region up to five times on a yearly basis.

Thus, it appears the WHO is both emphasizing the wrong point and may be jumping the gun a bit on this story. Meanwhile, the corporate media follows along passively.


1  World Health Organization. Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus – Ukraine. WHO Sept. 1, 2015.
2  Cha AE. Outbreak of rare, mutated poliovirus that originated from vaccine in Ukraine leaves two children paralyzedThe Washington Post Sept. 2, 2015.
3  Fisher BL. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission (p. 12-13). National Vaccine Information Center November 2014.
4  Fisher BL. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission (p. 13). National Vaccine Information Center November 2014.
5  Ukraine: UN agencies call for urgent action to stop spread of polio virusUnited Nations News Centre Sept. 4, 2015.
6  Miles T. Ukraine outbreak brings polio back to Europe, WHO saysReuters Sept. 2, 2015.
7  APUkraine: sufficient vaccine coming to block polio outbreakSeattle Post-Intelligencer Sept. 3, 2015.
8  APWorld Health Organization: 2 polio cases found in Ukraine, caused by mutated virus in vaccineMinneapolis Star Tribune Sept. 2, 2015.
9  Thorpe D. Polio Outbreak In Ukraine Is Grim Reminder Of Need For Continued VigilanceForbes Sept. 4, 2015.
10  McNeil DG. Polio Paralyzes 2 Children in West Ukraine OutbreakThe New York Times Sept. 2, 2015.


Ty Bollinger’s The truth about vaccines

I have been watching Ty Bollingers videos “The truth about vaccines” – there are 7 videos, about 1 1/2 hour long, each of them – very interesting and scary, with a lot of very important information. If statins are the scandal of the century, then vaccines might well be the scandal of the millennium, when we are talking about drugs/medicine.

Here you can find some more information about “The truth about vaccines”

and here’s an interview:

Vaccines have been a hot button issue over the last several decades. There is a mass of conflicting information out there about vaccines, but what’s true? What’s the right decision? We went to Ty Bollinger, founder and organizer of the docuseries The Truth About Vaccines to find our way through this complicated and controversial topic.

In this interview, Ty explains to us some of the history of vaccines, and the potential risks and benefits involved with vaccinations. This docuseries is premiering on April 12th, and it will be an incredibly informative and unbiased overview of all things vaccines.


First question, why are vaccines such a hot button issue?

Well, the reasons that vaccines are such a hot button issue is number one, we’re dealing with children. So, anytime you’re dealing with somebody’s kids, it’s going to be a topic that people want to make sure that they have accurate information on to protect their kids.

Because regardless of what your position is on vaccines, everybody loves their children. I think they’re a hot button because it deals with children’s lives, number one. They’re also a hot button issue because there’s so much conflicting information from both sides of the fence. We’re told that vaccines save lives, but we also know that vaccines cause serious and sometimes fatal side effects.

We know that because the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, the VAERS system that was set up in the mid-80s has paid out over 3.6 billion dollars to families of vaccine-injured children. So, we know that they cause side effects. We know that there are adverse events. And so, it’s just a risk/benefit analysis.

Does the risk of serious, fatal side effect outweigh the benefit that can be conferred if you prevent the child from catching one of these diseases or save their life? Another hot button topic in vaccines is – are the vaccine ingredients safe, right? Well, if you look at the ingredients, such as Thimerosal, formaldehyde, aluminum, and a lot of other ingredients, these are known neurotoxins.

They damage the brain. So, they’re admittedly in vaccines, but the official position is they don’t damage the brain. But the problem is that many vaccines contain Polysorbate 80, which is an emulsifier that actually is used by the pharmaceutical industry to take pharmaceutical drugs and cross the blood-brain barrier.

The very purpose of Polysorbate 80 is to get things into the brain. And it’s in vaccines, many vaccines. And so, we know that the vaccines that there’s Polysorbate 80, that those neurotoxins get in the brain and cause brain damage. That’s a real hot button topic, too, because despite the fact that the vaccines contain these known neurotoxins, the official position of the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] is that they’re safe and they don’t cause any brain damage.

We’re told that the adverse events are extremely rare, and that may be the case. I’m not really sure what “extremely rare” means. But if it’s your kid that has an adverse event or is diagnosed with autism or is permanently brain damaged, then that doesn’t matter if they’re extremely rare to you or not. It’s your kid.

I think another hot button topic in the vaccine area is the fact that many vaccines are now being mandated by governments, right? They are. You have to take vaccines if your kid goes to school, or certain hospital workers are being mandated to take vaccines. So, we have the government actually infringing on personal medical choices.

The Nuremburg Code says that medical—the Nuremburg tribunal was convened after World War II, and they basically were trying the Nazi war criminals that had performed—not only did they kill a bunch of Jews, millions of Jews, and millions of Soviets, Christians, and all other kinds of people, in World War II, but they actually did medical experimentation on their subjects.

And one of the reasons the Nuremburg Tribunal was convened is to set standards for medical experimentation in the future. The findings of the Nuremburg tribunal, the Nuremburg Code, is that medical procedures must be voluntary. They cannot be forced upon you. So, the very fact that we are now having governments across the United States, state governments and even the federal government at times, mandating certain vaccines, it actually violates the Nuremburg Code.

That’s a real big one. It’s freedom of choice. Should you have a government that actually tells you, “You have to have a vaccine or else we’re going to hold you down or whatever.” So, there are just a lot of reasons. I could go on and on, but those are some of the main reasons why vaccines are such a hot button topic.


And then what made you do such research into the topic?

Well, I started seeing and doing the research in the travels for “The Truth About Cancer.” I started seeing this connection between vaccines and cancer. Because we know for a fact that the Simian Virus 40 was a monkey virus that contaminated the polio vaccine back in the 50s. We’ve seen hundreds of thousands of cases of leukemia and lymphomas that have resulted because of the fact that this monkey pox, this contaminated monkey virus got into the polio vaccine, and it’s causing cancer, even still today.

So, that’s what really led me into vaccines from there. And then also from a personal perspective. Our eldest daughter, way back 16 years ago when she was an infant, we were contemplating whether or not we should vaccinate her, and we were actually bullied into vaccinating by our pediatrician. He said “If you don’t vaccinate, you are no longer welcome to be a patient here. Your daughter’s not welcome.”

And we get that a lot nowadays. A lot of pediatricians say “Hey, you either vaccinate or you can’t be our patient.” So, that’s from a personal perspective, one of the reasons that we were interested in vaccines as well.


What is a docu-series and what’s the purpose?

A docu-series is a documentary miniseries. We trademarked the term. And the purpose of this docu-series is to educate on the facts about vaccines, the ingredients, the different types of vaccines, and whether they are in fact safe or effective.

And we’ll go back to the history of vaccines. We’ll cover specific vaccines in this docu-series. And just to educate people about what’s in the vaccines, what are they used for, how safe are they, how effective are they, and that way they can make a good choice if they decided they want to vaccinate or not.

The stance is neither pro- nor anti-vaccine. That is a false dichotomy that’s been created to put people in one of two camps. And the reality is, most people are not “pro” all vaccines or “anti” all vaccines; they are somewhere in the middle. They think maybe some vaccines are safe and some are effective and some aren’t, and some should be used and some aren’t.

But by creating this false dichotomy and these two groups that you have to force everybody in, you create this war between the groups as opposed to just getting people the facts and letting them decide for themselves. So, this stance is pro-truth, it’s pro-science, and it’s pro-child. That is our stance.

And just to relay the truth about vaccines and let people make up their own mind. Some people may want to vaccinate. That’s great. Some people may want to vaccinate according to the CDC full schedule. That’s great if they want to do that. That’s their choice. Some people may want to delay vaccinations. That’s their choice. Good for them. Some people may want to not vaccinate at all. Great. That’s their choice. Good for them. We should have the freedom of choice to do what we want and not have a heavy-handed government stuffing it down our throat and telling us “You have to do this or else.”


Can you tell us about some of the doctors, speakers, and experts?

Well, we have 60 experts, including people like Dr. Joseph Mercola, Mike Adams, Sayer Ji with GreenMedInfo. These are household names in the natural health realm. Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who is one of the producers of Vaxxed.

Drs. Jack and Heather Wolfson, very well-known. Dr. Bryan Hooker was interviewed. Dr. Judy Mikovits, who’s a scientist from the National Cancer Institute. We interviewed a couple of attorneys: Bob Krakow and Michael Hugo, both of which are attorneys that actually litigate vaccine injuries in the vaccine court.

Del Bigtree, Polly Tommey, the other producers of Vaxxed, have been interviewed. Dr. Sing Hang Lee, Chinese medical doctor that’s a specialist on the Gardasil vaccine. Let’s see, who else did we interview? Barbara Loe Fisher, who is the president of the National Vaccine Information Center.

Dr. Larry Palevsky, renowned board-certified pediatrician from New York State. Dr. Suzanne Humphries, who’s a medical doctor who’s also very well-known. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who everybody’s heard of Bobby Kennedy, who’s President John F. Kennedy’s nephew, and he’s very outspoken on the vaccine front. He’s actually appointed by President Trump recently to be one of the heads of the Vaccine Commission.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny we interviewed, Dr. Robert Scott Bell, Dr. Paul Thomas, who wrote a book called The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, who is not against vaccines. He’s actually for vaccines, but on a delayed schedule. And his co-author, Jennifer Margulis, we interviewed both of those people up in Portland. Nico LaHood, who’s a District Attorney for Bear County, Texas, we interviewed him.

Minister Tony Muhammed, who’s an international lecturer and vaccine activist. He’s a representative of the Nation of Islam. Another is David Avocado Wolfe and Dr. Toni Bark, medical doctor. Neil Miller, who wrote a book, 400 Critical Vaccine Studies. I mean the list is on and on.


What kinds of things can I expect to learn?

Well, you’re going to learn the truth. We’re just going to present the facts. I take a completely non-biased position. We present the facts; we let you decide. Sounds like a news network, “We report, you decide,” right? Fair and balanced. So, that’s our position on this.

We’re just going to tell the truth about vaccines, let people decide.


How do you participate in the docu-series?

Click here to watch the video trailer about the series and enter in your name and email address. Once you have signed up, we will be in touch with you and starting on April 12th you will get a new link each day for 7 straight days to watch every episode of the series for FREE.

Videoföreläsning med Linda Karlström om risker och vetenskapliga brister med vacciner

Det har ju sänts en serie med videos om vacciner ganska så nyss, Ty Bollingers “The truth about vaccines – jag såg alla avsnitten, och är chockad och förfärad över hur mycket som är fel, om man kallar det där med statiner för århundradets läkemedelsskandal, så kan man kanske kalla det där med vacciner för årtusendets läkemedelsskandal… ska försöka hitta lite videos med info jag kan posta här – det går ju alltid att köpa “The truth about vaccines” – det är en serie på 7 videos, med ungefär 1 1/2 timme för varje avsnitt. Här finns lite mer info: https://www.facebook.com/ttavdocuseries/

Och här är en föreläsning på svenska av Linda Karlström, om riskerna och de vetenskapliga bristerna om vaccin:

Herd Immunity, article about mass vaccination from Suzanne Humphries, MD

Another important article about vaccination


“Herd Immunity.” The flawed science and failures of mass vaccination, Suzanne Humphries, MD

The oft-parroted sound bite – “we need herd immunity”- implies that if ninety five percent of the population can become “immune” to a disease via vaccination, target immunity levels will be met and diseases will either be eradicated or controlled. This sound bite is the most commonly pulled weapon used by the vaccinators, only second to “smallpox and polio were eradicated by vaccination.” “Herd immunity” is the trump card for the defense of vaccination on TV, Internet, medical journals and newspapers as to why we should be vaccinated over and over throughout our lives, with an ever-increasing number of vaccines.

Paul Offit smiled and PLAYED THE CARD while peddling his book on the comedy central channel as Steven Colbert jokingly said, “if the vaccines work so good for you, why do I need one?” Dr. Mark Segal PULLED IT on fox news as Mary Holland, JD eloquently described the issue of vaccine injury and loss of legal recourse in an era of forced and mandated vaccines. In addition to flaunting several false allegations and sound bites, Dr. Segal’s well-rehearsed rant brushed right over the issue at hand, the fact that victims of vaccine injury have no legal right to sue – and instead launched into his agenda of scaring the listeners by parroting the “herd immunity” dogma.

The hype about herd immunity unfortunately creates a wall of hostility between those who vaccinate and those who delay some vaccines, avoid certain vaccines, or quit vaccinating altogether.

Since the beginning of vaccination, there is little proof that vaccines are responsible for eradicating disease even when herd immunity vaccination levels have been reached. Yet celebrity doctors rattle on about your unvaccinated neighbor being the biggest threat to your child – as if vaccination was the only way to avoid an illness or stay healthy.

To make matters worse, this intimidation to vaccinate is played out in an environment where WHO and vaccine manufacturers have been accused of scandalous misrepresentations of disease risk or vaccine safety and effectiveness. If the allegations against these entities are true, which I believe they are, we are being systematically altered, sickened and manipulated by powerful governing bodies that either don’t understand the risks of vaccination, or don’t care. We are told that the health of the herd is more important than any single life, and you now have no conventional legal recourse when your little sheep is wounded by any type of vaccine, no matter how it happened.

The money factor
The population of the world is expanding over the past 200 years where vaccines have been used, and this makes obtaining herd immunity even more expensive and impossible today than ever. How many billions of people would need to be vaccinated how many times to eradicate just one illness based on the theory of vaccine herd immunity? How much would that cost? Consider the cost of vaccines, refrigeration, vaccinators, and hazardous waste removal. Just look at chicken pox vaccine at $7.25 per dose for the CDC discounted price. Each child gets 2 doses. The US census shows 25.7 million children between 0-5 years. Just the cost of the vaccines to vaccinate each of those children, not including the lifetime of boosters, refrigeration, administration and waste, costs the government over 372 million dollars. Chicken pox vaccines are now being exposed for the failure they are, but vaccine profits are still climbing. After the members of the herd stopped transmitting natural immunity to each other because of the vaccine effect, shingles increased. The response- more doses of vaccine for children and a shingles vaccine to adults. HERE is a recent journal abstract describing the failure of herd protection by varicella vaccines. In a SEPARATE DOCUMENT, Dr. Goldman says:

“Prior to the universal varicella vaccination program, 95% of adults experienced natural chickenpox (usually as school aged children)—these cases were usually benign and resulted in long term immunity. This high percentage of individuals having long term immunity has been compromised by mass vaccination of children which provides at best 70 to 90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration—shifting chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 20 times more risk of death and 15 times more risk of hospitalization compared to children. Add to this the adverse effects of both the chickenpox and shingles vaccines as well as the potential for increased risk of shingles for an estimated 30 to 50 years among adults. The Universal Varicella (Chickenpox) Vaccination Program now requires booster vaccines; however, these are less effective than the natural immunity that existed in communities prior to licensure of the varicella vaccine.”

In India, doctors are concerned about profit margins being protected before human lives, with recommendations to vaccinate every child with more expensive, newer vaccines.  Dr Jacob Puliyel describes the problems he sees..

“An analysis in the Lancet showed how the Pneumococcal vaccine reduces only 4 cases of pneumonia per 1000 children. The cost for vaccinating 1000 children comes to $ 12,750. Treating the 4 cases of pneumonia in India using WHO protocol, would cost $ 1. The pneumococcus strains prevalent in India are nearly all sensitive to inexpensive antibiotics like penicillin. In the US which has been using the pneumococcal vaccine for some years now, there has been a strain shift – strains covered in the vaccine are being replaced by other strains. Ominously the new strains are more antibiotic resistant. Vaccine has simply made the problem of pneumococcal disease worse. Yet this vaccine is being pushed in Africa and Asia.…It is not about lives lost in poor countries – it is all about the cash register. These organizations and their sponsors have profit margins to protect. Ethics is not a major issue with them.”

The profits to vaccine manufacturers and the government must be enormous.

The CDC is in the vaccine business. Members of the CDC’s Vaccine Advisory Committee accept payment from vaccine manufacturers. Sanofi-Pasteur, Merck and others specifically seek to employ CDC staff once their contracts have run out. Relationships have included sharing a vaccine patent, owning stock in a vaccine company, payments for research, payment to monitor manufacturer vaccine tests, and funding academic departments. Thanks to a 1980 law, the CDC currently holds dozens of licensing agreements. It also has numerous ongoing projects to collaborate on new vaccines.

The science?
What science is there behind the belief that the herd can be protected by vaccinating enough of the sheep? Or that any disease has been eradicated from the planet thanks to a vaccine?

Recently, I was told by a vaccinator that “herd immunity is just a definition and so it can’t actually be wrong. “ But the assumption of a 95% vaccination rate giving the herd a chance at eradication or higher levels of health – can be wrong. Let us go back in time and see just where the idea behind this definition probably comes from. Dr A.W. Hedrich in 1929, studied the natural occurrence of measles.

“On the basis of field surveys of various workers, it is inferred that approximately 95% of the children in cities suffer measles attacks by the fifteenth birthday. “  


Before vaccines, outbreaks of measles were observed in 2 to 3 year cycles, and 95% of the population developed immunity by the age of fifteen.

The original idea that vaccination could strengthen the herd’s immunity, assumed that there was only one clinical event, and that one natural exposure equated life -long immunity. But this was not the case back when the diseases circulated freely. Vaccinators miss the point that the body defends most efficiently as a result of ongoing re-exposure. They try to mimic this with boosters. But the vaccination plan leaves the elderly(due to vaccine-induced immunity being short-lived and antigens taken out of circulation) and the very young(due to lack of transferrable maternal immunity) more vulnerable to several diseases that were not a threat to them before vaccination. In the case of chicken pox, vaccination renders the elderly more apt to shingles infections, because the herd has now lost the continued and benign re-exposures to children with chicken pox.

Instead of figuring out why a very small number develop dangerous invasive conditions, vaccine enthusiasts recommend vaccinating as often as possible in order to protect against something that would never be a danger to the vast majority of those vaccinated. If you constantly swab throats of healthy people most would be carrying and circulating supposed pathogens, as commensals.[2] At any one time in any society, neisseriae(the bacteria isolated in some cases of meningitis) are being circulated, yet most of the time, nothing happens, other than the body notes it, defends against it, and the host has no idea that they even carried it.[3] But now that vaccines for as many types as possible have been developed, the vaccine is the answer to the problem. This is typical for diseases today.

It is well documented that prior to vaccination, cycles of natural infection added to the herd’s immunity.

“The formal demonstration that both maternal antibodies and early exposure to infection are required for long-term protection illustrated that constant re-infection cycles have an essential role in building a stable herd immunity. In a population that is not constantly exposed to the infection during early infancy under the immunologic umbrella of maternal antibodies or vaccinated thoroughly a serious risk of re-emerging infections may arise. “  


Vaccination creates a “quasi-sterile” environment that opens up the possibility of disease outbreaks.

“Attempts to eradicate measles virus or poliovirus eliminates antigen exposure of infants to these pathogens. Such quasi-sterile epidemiological situations may actually increase the risk of outbreaks.” 


We know this is possible because there have been eruptions of measles in the USA in populations that were 100 percent vaccinated.

“The affected high school had 276 students and was in the same building as a junior high school with 135 students. A review of health records in the high school showed that all 411 students had documentation of measles vaccination on or after the first birthday, in accordance with Illinois law.” 


Within the scope of vaccination, when a quasi-sterile situation is created, and measles breaks out in the midst, the only solution within that paradigm is to vaccinate more people, more often. This is a backwards solution to the problem when considering who remains susceptible even in the face of full compliance: infants and non-immune adults. Susceptible age groups have essentially traded places since vaccinating. What used to happen with measles is that infants were protected by maternal antibodies, adults were protected by continued exposure, and infected children handled the disease normally and became immune for long periods of time. So, while measles vaccines have decreased the expression of measles infections, it has not necessarily improved the bigger picture. And certainly there are numerous troubles with the side effects of the vaccine.

Prior to vaccination, mothers were naturally immune to measles and passed that immunity to their infants via placenta and breast milk. Vaccinated mothers may have vaccine immunity, which is not the same immunologically, as natural immunity. One of the major differences in the vaccine-induced immunity is that it cannot be passed from mother to infant.

Since most vaccines are delivered by injection, the mucous membranes are bypassed and thus blood antibodies are produced but not mucosal antibodies. Mucosal exposure is what contributes to the production of antibodies in the mammary gland. A child’s exposure to the virus while being breastfed by a naturally immune mother would lead to an asymptomatic infection that results in long-term immunity to that virus. Vaccinated mothers have lower levels of virus-specific antibodies in the serum and milk compared to naturally immune mothers and thus their infants are unprotected.

“Infants whose mothers were born after 1963 had a measles attack rate of 33%, compared to 12% for infants of older mothers.” Infants whose mothers were born after 1963 are more susceptible to measles than are infants of older mothers. An increasing proportion of infants born in the United States may be susceptible to measles.” 


For the disease of measles, we see that while the clinical case rate may have declined with vaccination, the most sensitive members of the herd are at an increased risk- as a result of vaccination.

Dr Peter Aaby has produced volumes of research on measles in Africa. Initially there was a belief that measles infection was associated with immune suppression and higher long-term mortality, but that belief came from vaccine research, not natural measles research.

“The belief in persistent immune suppression was stimulated by increased mortality after high-titre measles vaccination.” 


Once natural measles was monitored long-term the knowledge changed. According to Aaby,

“When measles infection is mild, clinical measles has no long-term excess mortality and may be associated with better overall survival than no clinical measles infection. Sub-clinical measles is common among immunised children and is not associated with excess mortality.”  


Measles is mildest when the infected person is replete with vitamins C and A. The devastation and mortality you hear about with measles comes from starving populations.

Do you know that 30% of cases of measles in unvaccinated are missed because they are so mild?[10] Subclinical measles is an entity that most doctors today are unaware of. If they are missed in unvaccinated, and there are known outbreaks of measles in 100 percent vaccinated populations, are cases missed in vaccinated populations too? Is measles still alive and well but going unnoticed in vaccinated countries, until a well-publicized outbreak occurs, as vaccine necessity is being trumpeted? What doctor would know or is even looking for atypical measles?

Talk to your grandmother about measles. Ask her if she saw death and destruction from the disease. It was not a disease that needed eradication. The high death rates were in countries where children were undernourished and lacked vitamins necessary to process the virus. Alexander Langmuir, MD is known today as “the father of infectious disease epidemiology.” In 1949 he created the epidemiology section of what is now known as the CDC. He also headed the Polio Surveillance Unit that was started in 1955 after the polio vaccine misadventures. Dr Langmuir knew that measles was not a disease that needed eradication when he said:

“To those who ask me, ‘Why do you wish to eradicate measles?,’ I reply with the same answer that Hillary used when asked why he wished to climb Mt. Everest. He said, ‘Because it is there.’ To this may be added, “. . and it can be done.”  


Langmuir also knew that by the time vaccination was developed, measles mortality in the USA had already declined to minimal levels when he described measles as a

“… self-limiting infection of short duration, moderate severity, and low fatality…” 


The vaccine was created because it could be done, not because we needed it. Measles is not eradicated. Outbreaks happen all over the world, and will continue. And now infants will be unprotected because of the absence of maternal antibodies in their vaccinated mother’s milk. So much for protecting the most vulnerable in the herd.


“We were fortunate enough to address their own medical (and) health officials where we reminded them of the incidence of smallpox in formerly “immunized” Filipinos. We invited them to consult their own medical records and asked them to correct us if our own facts and figures disagreed. No such correction has been forthcoming, and we can only conclude that between 1918-1919 there were 112,549 cases of smallpox notified, with 60,855 deaths. Systematic (mass) vaccination started in 1905, and since its introduction case mortality increased alarmingly. Their own records comment that “The mortality is hardly explainable.”

    —Dr. Archie Kalokerinos from

    • Second Thoughts on Disease

Orthopox is a member of the family of Poxviridae. The ancestor of the poxviruses is not known but structural studies suggest it may have been an adenovirus or a species related to both the poxviruses and the adenoviruses. Orthopox viruses include cowpox(vaccinia), smallpox(variola), and monkeypox. Mutations do occur in these viruses, but at a very slow rate.

Between October 1970 and May 1971 a poxvirus was isolated from some symptomatic patients in West Africa. That virus is now known as “human monkeypox.” Monkeypox got its name because monkeys were the first animals known to have harbored the monkeypox virus. Scientists now say that the primary reservoirs for monkeypox virus are not monkeys but probably squirrels. WHO officials in 1976 had no idea what the true reservoir of infection was.[13] Today, according to CDC, it remains uncertain.

Smallpox was declared eradicated worldwide by the World Health Assembly on May 8,th 1980. Vaccination was stopped in the USA in 1972. However, poxviruses that were indistinguishable from smallpox continued to cause human disease.

Monkeys in surrounding areas where monkeypox outbreaks occur usually test negative for monkeypox. But prairie dogs, exotic rodents, Gambian rats, dormice, rope squirrels and other animals have tested positive. Nobody really knows when or where monkeypox viruses originated, but they seem to be close relatives of cowpox and smallpox. All three viruses have rodent reservoirs, which is important when considering the history and current transmission of smallpox and monkeypox. Today, monkeypox outbreaks are blamed on rodents or exotic pet imports, not person-to -person transmission even though human transmission does occur. Historically, smallpox reservoirs were also rodents – during a time when rodents were eaten as food and when infestations were commonplace. Yet in the discussion of smallpox outbreaks this is rarely mentioned. What we hear is how the vaccine eradicated the disease.

THIS ARTICLE states that monkeypox was first recorded in 1970 after the eradication of smallpox in the Democratic Republic of Congo. University of California, School of Public Health epidemiologist Dr Anne Rimoin states that monkeypox first arrived in humans after smallpox eradication, even though it has been on the earth for millennia.

“Monkeypox has probably occurred for millennia in central Africa, but it’s only since the eradication of smallpox that it’s been a disease that actually happens in humans,” Rimoin says. ” 

There is absolutely zero certainty as to when monkeypox first colonized humans. It is more accurate to say that monkeypox was first detected in humans around the time that smallpox was being declared eradicated, not that it arrived in humans at that time. Differentiation tests were not carried out on most cases of pox in the past 200 years.

Laboratory diagnostic assays for monkeypox include virus isolation and electron microscopy, ELISA, immunofluorescent antibody assay, histopathologic analysis, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Unfortunately, most of these methods are relatively nonspecific and are unable to differentiate monkeypox viral infection from infection with other poxviruses.[14] All but PCR are fraught with false positives, false negatives, and cross reactivity.

In the 1970s and 1980s, biochemical tests were unreliable in differentiating between monkeypox and smallpox. Animal challenge tests were historically used to determine the difference between monkeypox and smallpox. The technique involved inoculating rabbits and watching the characteristics of the pox. Initially the two kinds of pox appear similar in the rabbit, but after a few days, monkeypox distinguishes itself as it becomes hemorrhagic. LINK TO DOC HERE.

The problem with such means for distinction is that there has always been a hemorrhagic form of smallpox.

“There are four types of variola major smallpox: ordinary; modified; flat; and hemorrhagic…. Hemorrhagic smallpox has a much shorter incubation period and is likely not to be initially recognized as smallpox when presenting to medical care. Smallpox vaccination also does not provide much protection, if any, against hemorrhagic smallpox.”  


ELISA is not much of a gold standard test as it casts a very wide net, and is fraught with false positive and false negative results.[16]  ELISA TUTORIAL HERE.

The genomes of these three orthopox viruses are extremely conserved and require a technology that can detect the minute differences. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a newer test that came on the scene in the 1980s. This test is different in that it can potentially find pieces of DNA from a virus. The genetic sequence of a virus has to first be mapped prior to designing a PCR test. So before smallpox, cowpox, or monkeypox viruses were characterized genetically, PCR could not be applied to distinguish between them. The first PCR test for monkeypox was used in 1997, but highly sensitive real-time PCR was not in use until 2006.[17] Different biotech companies have developed different tests that use different primers. PCR, while highly sensitive and specific at about 98%, still has drawbacks, contamination being the biggest one. No test is foolproof. Nonetheless it is probably the best assay available for detection and distinction today.

It should now be obvious that during the two centuries of smallpox vaccination and up until the 1990s there was no certain way of testing for distinct orthopox viruses. During the two centuries of vaccination, the viruses were likely to mutate, and certain strains could have been selected out as a result of vaccination.

Therefore, does anyone know how much ‘smallpox’ disease was actually monkeypox or vaccinia? Given that monkeypox is thought to be an ancient virus, where was it during the smallpox epidemics? Was it called hemorrhagic smallpox?

In 1972, scientists were asking similar questions when they said:

“Is it possible that there is an animal reservoir for smallpox infection? Could monkeypox be a source of new outbreaks of true variola? Or, can the monkeypox virus undergo certain mutations and become identical in its pathogenicity and infectiveness to the variola virus?” 


ACCORDING TO SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN., monkeypox is not that rare. Seven hundred and sixty cases of monkeypox were counted in the Congo between 2006 and 2007.

Before and during the time of eradication declaration, PCR was unavailable, and the different poxviruses couldn’t be distinguished by their DNA, but by a skin test on rabbits, chick embryo membranes, and blood tests that were fraught with uncertainty. It seems to me that what was once called smallpox was likely a very non-uniform disease that could have been anything from cowpox to two forms of smallpox to chickenpox to monkeypox.

“Monkeypox virus is closely related to some other orthopoxviruses such as variola (smallpox) virus, and it cannot be distinguished from these viruses in some laboratory tests.…In 1996-1997, an outbreak [of monkeypox] in the DRC continued for more than a year, with a person–to–person transmission rate estimated at 78%. However, epidemiological evidence suggests that many of the cases in this outbreak may have been chickenpox (varicella); the number of monkeypox cases and the transmission rate might have been overestimated due to self-reporting and the unavailability of laboratory testing.” 


When vaccination stopped, monkeypox was suddenly diagnosed in humans. Diagnostic methods were absent during the great vaccine campaigns and everything pox-like was considered smallpox and counted as smallpox. Differentiating was not a priority.

Variola, the smallpox virus, is not in the smallpox vaccine. Instead, a cultured form of cowpox, called vaccinia, is the virus used to prevent smallpox. That same vaccine also covers monkeypox, according to the CDC:

“Because the monkeypox virus is related to the virus that causes smallpox, the smallpox vaccine can protect people from getting monkeypox as well as smallpox.

Smallpox vaccine is effective at protecting people against monkeypox when it is given before they are exposed to monkeypox. (Exposure includes very close contact with a person or animal that has monkeypox.) Experts believe that vaccination after exposure to monkeypox may help prevent the disease or make it less severe.” [20]

Even though PCR can distinguish between the three viruses, clinically and immunologically the viruses are so similar, that one virus in the vaccine is thought to immunize against the two other viruses. During outbreaks they all look the same.

After the world trade center collapses in New York there were concerns over potential bioterrorism. Forty thousand health care workers and first responders and 450 thousand military were vaccinated in 2003. They were all contagious for the nineteen-day post-vaccine shedding period. Some doctors were asked to receive the vaccine in order to care for those who took the vaccine and developed vaccinia, or to care for those who became infected upon contact with a recently vaccinated person.

Multi-state outbreaks of monkeypox were reported in the same year.[21] Most cases are presumed to have come from contact with prairie dogs exposed to rodents per CDC. However all cases were not exposed to animals.  ACCORDING TO A 2005 REPORT, of 72 cases only 37 cases were laboratory confirmed. Eleven original cases were thrown out of the database when they met exclusion criteria. EXCLUSION CRITERIA. There is mention of human to human infection, though in some reports this is denied.

This is a very strange coincidence; vaccination and concomitant pox outbreaks in the same year. Supposedly, monkeypox is not easily transmissible between humans, but there is a report in the literature of a 5 chain human-to -human transmission, and human-to-human monkeypox transmission is well documented.[22]  A NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE REPORT vaguely stated that “There was ‘limited or no’ spread of monkeypox virus through human contact during this outbreak.” 

In 2003, the year that half a million people were vaccinated in the USA – AND the only year of monkeypox outbreaks in the USA, a multistate (Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin) outbreak, was the source of the outbreak definitely prairie dogs? CDC doesn’t state how many pox cases were exposed to prairie dogs, just “the majority of them had direct or close contact.” The vagueness of CDC’s reports gives rise to doubts. Only 37 of 72 cases were confirmed with PCR tests, and eleven of the original total were excluded from analysis. Excluding numerous cases on frivolous grounds is one way to dampen a negative outcome after a vaccine accident.

Considering the link with vaccination is not far-fetched especially given that CDC reports say that only roughly half of cases were PCR confirmed. Vaccination has long been a relatively common means of transmitting pox outbreaks. According to Arita and Gromyko’s WHO bulletin in 1982, vaccination was a major fly in the eradication ointment…

“During the last 24 months, for example, surveillance reports from Canada and the United Kingdom have included 6 and 9 cases, respectively, of vaccine complications. At least 8 cases, however, were in persons who, while not vaccinated themselves, had been infected with vaccinia virus after being in contact with persons recently vaccinated. In some countries vaccination of recruits to the armed services has continued; these recruits will occasionally transmit vaccinia infection to unvaccinated persons, and inevitably some of the complications will be fatal. In the United Kingdom and Finland, smallpox vaccination of army recruits was discontinued in 1981.” 


Without discontinuing vaccination, it would have been impossible to stop the flow of smallpox. Doesn’t that lead you to wonder how much smallpox was the result of the vaccine rather than natural smallpox? We know that in places like Leicester UK, when vaccination ceased, so did smallpox. And there are numerous accounts of smallpox disease not only being much more severe and deadly among vaccinated populations, but also more prevalent.

Isn’t it interesting that smallpox vaccine defies everything we know about specificity in immunity and that one vaccine covers all sorts of pox, except chicken pox? Can you imagine, nowadays, if a vaccine researcher suggested that an illness could be prevented by using a slightly related virus? Today’s vaccines contain numerous strains and types of the same organism. Polio vaccine has 3 types of poliovirus, influenza 2 strains of type A and one strain of type B. But smallpox vaccine today contains one of many possible strains of a related virus, not even the smallpox(variola) virus at all. In Jenner’s time, it is anyone’s guess which viruses ended up in the vaccines since the technique was so primitive and typing methods were not available. Still, these vaccinia vaccines are thought to have eradicated smallpox, and serve as the foundation for vaccine faith.

Scientists back in the 1800s and early to mid 1900s had no way to differentiate smallpox, cowpox, monkeypox or most other pox diseases in humans. Nor was there any effort to differentiate, until the disease was declared eradicated – just like when polio was eradicated. Anything that looked like polio, but not caused by a polio virus, was called acute flaccid paralysis.

Monkeypox and smallpox look identical on physical examination. Have a look at these two photos:

You probably can’t tell the difference between the two diseases, and neither can most doctors. Edward Jenner and the doctors of the 1800s and 1900s were also unable to distinguish smallpox – major and minor, monkeypox, or cowpox, or even chickenpox.

“When [monkeypox]infection in human beings does occur, it can be clinically indistinguishable from smallpox, chickenpox, and other causes of a vesiculopustular rash.”


It is now known that many cases of smallpox were mild. These are termed variola minor as the mortality is only about one percent. Variola major and variola minor are indistinguishable using the sensitive PCR test. In order to distinguish the variants, because they are nearly identical, an ultra-sensitive, highly technical real time PCR test using MGB-Eclipse probe chemistry had to be designed. Note that these tests were designed using laboratory stored smallpox virus, not natural virus. Scientists have to go to great lengths in order to make a genetic distinction between these two variants because they are so very similar. So the question that begs an answer is, are these viruses really that different? Distinction is ridiculously laborious and such splitting hairs is fraught with potential errors. Loveless[24] et al. describe the tedious process of distinction and the pitfalls of the assay in their paper.  Other researchers note that about one-third of the variola minor viral proteins are 100% identical to correlates in the variola major strains and the remainder were >/=95% identical.

Do you think your doctor would know a case of variola minor if he/she saw it? Or would it just be called chicken pox? Do you think your doctor would even think that it could be smallpox, given that smallpox is thought to be eradicated? There are clinical means to distinguish the difference, but few doctors think of it, and in the minor forms of smallpox it wouldn’t matter anyway.

Many believe that smallpox was eradicated from the planet because of vaccination. I once believed this idea that was taught to me in medical school, and that all conventional doctors parrot as if they understood the history. With just a little research it becomes evident that even though smallpox seems to have disappeared, this was not the result of mass vaccination.

It is obvious that the vaccines of 1796-1900s were not purified or uniform, yet they serve as the foundation for successful vaccination. They were made on farms from scrapings of infected cow bellies, coarsely filtered, and mixed in glycerine. While today’s vaccine product may be more meticulously manufactured, the CDC admits that the science behind even modern smallpox recommendations has been little more than a guess.

“…data on duration of protection and recommendations on periodicity of vaccinations are limited and based to a large extent on historic precedent and expert opinion used to develop previous ACIP recommendations for smallpox vaccination for laboratory workers using orthopoxviruses.” 


And CDC has no idea what antibody titer is protective.

“The levels of antibody reported by these tests indicate only exposure, and the protective antibody titer against smallpox infection is unknown.”  


They surmise that the vaccine provides high-level immunity for 3-5 years.

Here is a graph of smallpox vaccination deaths and smallpox disease deaths, from England spanning the years of 1906-1922.

The vaccine-associated deaths are conspicuously high, at about half the rate of smallpox deaths.

Dr. Charles T. Pearce in his 1868 essay on vaccination wrote:

“It is a remarkable fact that Jenner’s[the inventor of smallpox vaccine] first child, his eldest son, on whom he experimented, died subsequently of consumption[tuberculosis]. Another of his subjects, the man Phipps, whom Jenner vaccinated, also died of consumption.”

Those who were vaccinated for smallpox were noted to be more severely affected by smallpox and tuberculosis. Many were exposed to tuberculosis from tuberculous animals that were used to make vaccines.  CLICK HERE TO LINK TO “SMALLPOX AND THE FIRST VACCINE” CHAPTER FROM OUR UPCOMING BOOK.

Smallpox manifested in several different forms(ordinary, modified, malignant, hemorrhagic). Genetically the minor and major forms of variola are related and indistinguishable by PCR. Individual susceptibility, rather than the virus probably made the biggest difference. Susceptibility would have certainly increased after injection of filthy vaccines that contained myriad bacteria and viruses.

What is most likely is that the appearance and disappearance of epidemics had much to do with the constitution and care of the population of the times. Scurvy was common in areas with hemorrhagic smallpox. This is no surprise to anyone who understands the full spectrum of ascorbic acid’s function in the body, especially on blood vessels.

Pox epidemics declined as a result of sanitation and improved nutrition. During the era of smallpox most people were living in squalor, eating no fresh food, but rotten milk and rotten meat, drinking sewer water, living among filthy rodents, and working long hours for little pay. Pox viruses are ancient, but smallpox evolved as a deadly killer as humanity devolved to overcrowded city dwellers living with filth, squalor, and desperation.

Historical evidence points to the fact that the vaccinated were amongst the sickest in times of smallpox vaccines. Protests against the vaccinators and smallpox vaccination were massive.[27] Parents commonly chose jail rather than permit their newborn babies to be vaccinated. Entire towns and districts revolted before the disease was finally declared eradicated, and the vaccine madness ended.

Smallpox vaccination ended in the 1980s because smallpox had declined and because there was so much trouble with the old unsafe vaccine. That same trouble with the newer supposedly more safe smallpox vaccines is why smallpox vaccination ended after the 2003 first responder effort. Which makes you wonder just how much more trouble there was with the old smallpox vaccine which had a very long list of known bacterial and other “contaminants” because of its method of production. After the 2003 vaccines, reports of generalized vaccinia, autoinoculation, erythema multiforme, myopericarditis, ocular vaccinia, and postvaccinial encephalitis were reported.

Smallpox was declared eradicated before clear distinctions between different poxviruses were made using DNA analysis. Symptoms alone are what were counted for smallpox during smallpox epidemics. Vaccination was a major source of smallpox outbreaks, and only a small portion of the earth’s entire herd was ever even vaccinated. Considering all of this, how can anyone believe that smallpox was eradicated with a vaccine?
With every vaccine suppressible disease, the general hysteria level usually depends on the availability of a vaccine. Once a vaccine was available, the disease was suddenly made out to be more problematic. Look how dangerous chicken pox became after the vaccine was developed.
Pertussis is now hot news and the unvaccinated interrupting herd immunity is raised over and over, despite the science that shows the vaccinated are by far and away the most affected by whooping cough.

“Our unvaccinated and under-vaccinated population did not appear to contribute significantly to the increased rate of clinical pertussis. Surprisingly, the highest incidence of disease was among previously vaccinated children in the eight to twelve year age group.” 


This is the most recent, but not the first study to demonstrate 86% of cases of proven whooping cough are in the vaccinated. How can getting even 100% vaccination uptake create an immune herd with such vaccines?

Mumps vaccine was known to be ineffective after two major outbreaks in vaccinated populations in the USA. Yet the solution was to double the boosters in children with a vaccine that is now ALLEGED by two former Merck scientists, to have been known to be ineffective by Merck’s executives.

Jenner’s initial promise was “We have a vaccine that will protect you for life with one injection.” But even he was revaccinating his patients yearly, within 5 years of making that statement. And when that doesn’t pan out with whooping cough, measles, mumps and whatever, the authorities say,, “We have a highly effective vaccine if it is given on time with boosters,” then “This is an excellent vaccine when 3 or 4 boosters are given, and adults are revaccinated.” Or in the case of whooping cough, introducing an all-together new vaccine. There is a new nasal vaccine in the pipeline for newborns, which will be given alongside the already ineffective whooping cough vaccine series in childhood. This will no doubt be touted as a wonderful combination.

Eradication target dates are constantly moved forward, and the unvaccinated or the vaccine refusers are blamed for all outbreaks. Or in the case of Pakistan, they are branded TERRORISTS or RELIGIOUS FANATICS for not wanting their children to have 30 oral polio vaccines by age 5. I have outlined in a PREVIOUS BLOG, just what is really going on in India and how her people are being terrorized by WHO and CDC as the rate of paralysis continues to skyrocket.

I believe that when diseases disappear from sight, the disappearance is never solely by virtue of the vaccine. Yet the vaccine always gets the credit, because the blind faith in vaccines is prioritized over the scientific evidence. Evidence to the contrary of the value of vaccination is consistently snuffed out and kept away from the mainstream media, so that the herd never hears a peep of the truth. Instead, they get the “herd immunity” sound bite, which gives undeserved credit to the risk-benefit ratio of vaccination. Inside the web of half-truths and misinformation, the vaccine religion somehow justifies the public display of resentment and fear of the unvaccinated.

DissolvingIllusions_Banner_940x198To read more of Dr Humphries’ writing on vaccines, see her new book “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines and the Forgotten History” available through amazon. Website is HERE.


A special thank you to “O” from “INSIDE VACCINES” for assistance in editing this document.

1. Hedrich AW. 1930. The corrected average attack rate of measles among city children. Am. J. Epidemiol. 11 (3): 576-600.
2. Hjuler IM. 1995. Bacterial colonization of the larynx and trachea in healthy children. Acta Paediatr. 1995 May;84(5):566-8. PMID:7633155
3.Caugant DA. 2009. Meningococcal carriage and disease—population biology and evolution. Vaccine. 2009 Jun 24;27 Suppl 2:B64-70. PMID: 19464092
4. Navarini AA et al. 2010. Long-lasting immunity by early infection of maternal-antibody-protected infants. Eur J Immunol. Jan;40(1):113-6. PMID: 19877011
5. ibid. Navarini.
6. Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students – Illinois. MMWR. June 22, 1984 / 33(24);349-51 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm
7. Papania M. et al. 1999. Increased susceptibility to measles in infants in the United States. Pediatrics. Nov;1045(5):e59 pp 1-6. PMID 19545585.
8. Aaby P. et al. 2002. Low mortality after mild measles infection compared to
uninfected children in rural west Africa. Vaccine. Nov 22;21(1-2):120-6. PMID:12443670
9. ibid Aaby.
11. Langmuir A.1962 .The importance of measles as a health problem. AJPH vol 52 no 2 pp1-4.
12. Ibid Langmuir.
13. Arita and Henderson. 1976. Monkeypox and whitepox viruses in West and Central Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 1976; 53(4): 347–353. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2366520/
14. Weinstein Robert. 2005. Reemergence of Monkeypox: Prevalence, Diagnostics, and Countermeasures. Clin Infect Dis. 41 (12): 1765-1771.
15.US FDA. Vaccines, blood and biologics. Smallpox. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/QuestionsaboutVaccines/ucm070429.htm
16. Human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) are a common cause of false positive ELIZA. A person can develop HAMA for different reasons. The clinical use of monoclonal mouse antibodies (e.g., for radioimaging, in the treatment of some cancers) often produces HAMA. HAMA may also arise because of incidental or occupational exposure to foreign proteins (e.g. veterinarians, farm workers, food preparers) or due to the presence of domestic animals in the home environment. Blood transfusion and dialysis are among other sources of heterophilic antibodies.
17. http://ci.vbi.vt.edu/pathinfo/pathogens/MPV.html
18. Is monkeypox a reservoir of smallpox? December 25, 1972. JAMA. 1972;222(13):1645-1646. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=346137
19. Monkeypox. 2009. Center for food security and public health. Iowa state university. Pg 1-9. http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/monkeypox.pdf
20. CDC Fact Sheet. Smallpox vaccine and monkeypox. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/smallpoxvaccine_mpox.htm.
21. US CDC. MMWR. July 11, 2003 / 52(27);642-646. Update: Multistate Outbreak of Monkeypox — Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5227a5.htm
22. Fenner et al. 1989. Smallpox and its eradication. Page 1306.ISBN-10: 9241561106
23. Arita and Gromyko. Surveillance of orthopoxvirus infections, and associated research, in the period after smallpox. Bull World Health Organ. 1982; 60(3): 367–375. PMCID: PMC2536002eradication.http://ukpmc.ac.uk/articles/PMC2536002/reload=0 jsessionid=82AeN4PIBbsmMueiZeZp.4
23A. Lancet Review. Jan 2004. Monkeypox. vol 4. pp 21-25.
24. Loveless BM. 2009. Differentiation of Variola major and Variola minor variants by MGB-Eclipse probe melt curves and genotyping analysis. Mol Cell Probes. 2009 Jun-Aug;23(3-4):166-70. Epub 2009 Apr 5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19345728
25. US CDC Emergency preparedness and response. CDC Interim Guidance for Revaccination of Eligible Persons who Participated in the US Civilian Smallpox Preparedness and Response Program. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/revaxmemo.asp
26. US CDC. Emergency preparedness and response. Questions and Answers About Post-event SmallpoxVaccination http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/faq/post_event.asp
27. Durbach, Nadja. 2004. Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in England, 1853–1907. ISBN-10: 0822334127
28. Witt M et al. 2012. Unexpectedly Limited Durability of Immunity Following Acellular Pertussis Vaccination in Pre-Adolescents in a North American Outbreak. Clin Infect Dis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):1730-5. PMID:22423127

Previous Older Entries

September 2017
« Aug